User:Zelki/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Enabling

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because it is an article I am interested in editing. Enabling is a common psychological buzzword online and thus it is important to have public access to research about it. I do not think this article is as comprehensive as it could be, nor is it intuitive to the common reader.

Evaluate the article
Lead section: The lead section is currently only one sentence and does not fully explain what enabling is.

Content: The content is relevant to the topic and does discuss key elements, but the explanations are sparse and there are some questionable references that may be out of date or otherwise unreliable.

Tone and Balance: The overall tone is fairly neutral, but there are some phrases that might be interpreted as excusing enabling behaviors.

Sources and References: Most of the sources are fine, but there are a couple that may have been biased or not written by a professional (i.e. a psychologist or researcher).

Organization and Writing Quality: This article reads like a rough draft. All of the sections need to be fleshed out further and more sections should be added. I also do not feel like there are enough sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

Images and Media: There is one image included and it is only tangentially related to the topic.

Talk Page: The article is part of two WikiProjects. There have been several editing suggestions that reflect my observations about the article.Overall Impression: I think the article has potential and information about the topic is needed, but it needs some heavy editing to give readers a more complete understanding of the topic.