User:Zelki/Psychogenic pain/Danielletjm2001 Peer Review

Looking at your Sandbox Draft, I can see a lot of useful contributions that you've already begun to make. I also think it's a great idea to add a "Controversy" section, so that part looks really great, as well. I think that the part of the article that needs the most work is the "Diagnosis" section, because it seems like it would be better if there was no section at all considering that it is "difficult to assess". It may be good to completely change or remove that section but still keep the part that explains that there are not many ways to test for psychogenic pain. Your additions are very useful and I'm looking forward to see how you transform the article!

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)