User:Zeqin/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) New Youth New Youth
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * New Youth is an important magazine to cultivate the new thought and culture to young people in China in early 20 century.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, it shows the development of the magazine.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes, it introduce the topic about the magazine.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes, it shows the historical background.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Underrepresented, it does not show the influence on the social environment.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, it is clear.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, the organization is good, and the sections show the content clearly.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * No, it just shows one image about the cover of the magazine.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * The talk page shows some comments about the viewpoints.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Stub-class. It is a part of WikiPojects Magazines, WikiProjects China and WikiProjects literature.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * It does not have question about the article, the comment just about the article topic.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * The article is clear and easy to read, but it can show more specific details.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * It describes the development of the magazine clearly.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * It can show the influence and the historical background.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * It is well-developed because it can show the development of the magazine and show the topic about that.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: