User:Zero939

Zero's Philosophy

Abstract Reasoning

Logically, “nothing” can’t exist without having “everything”, vice versa. Everything is a system with infinite depth, but with finite depth at the time of human understanding (tacit knowledge). In other words, we extract knowledge from the system. Therefore, in this possibly designed universe; everything is finitely infinite and infinitely finite. Mathematically, this universal architecture we live in can simply be translated as <--   -5.x, - 4.x, - 3.x, -2.x, - 1.x, 0.x, 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x    --> Where 0 is defined as nothing of existence, and every other number is defined as everything as existence, creating a paradox, in other words, two constantly conflicting forces; nothingness and everything.

Philosophically, everything in our universe can translate into a virtual measurement of anything possible number except 0 and the highest/lowest number possible which is... not possible or NAN in computational logic. In addition, nothingness can be seen as a supreme regulator of numbers.

In basic mathematics: 1+0 = 1, 1-0=1. Therefore nothing happened. No force of existence. However in computer arithmetic using a signed zero, 1/+ or -0 = negative ∞ or positive ∞ and 1*0=0.

Also x*0 = 0

Now there is a change, but on what level? What force of existence?

In conclusion nothingness is indeed a force. Sparking and representing new birth. Age of 0.

Everything a paradox on a quantum level?

System Perspective

It is to perceive and interpret everything within the universe as different systems and only that. It is to our understanding that we choose to label these systems to create a clear distinction between organic and robotic.

How Advanced Artificial Intelligence would work

This efficiency/system framework can prove as a fundamental base for programming advanced AI. Faster computers equal more allowable emulated systems that can be integrated into AI. With regards to processors, the more cores, the more systems that can run in parallel and ultimately not are limited by a subconscious mind. The AI would be a true intellectual powerhouse. With the right programming can eventually govern a society or world, even a universe.

- Low efficiency translates as wrong

- 50% is technically right & wrong at the same time, as a workaround it must be labelled as conflict. Thus, contingency is a logical solution.

- High efficiency translates as right

With exception to our world, 100% exists as true or 1 in binary and 0 exists and false in binary. Therefore the reasoning implies 1 as everything, 0 as nothing.

Another exception is an exact technicality. 50%. Our world is far too complex and as such it cannot exist. The concept exists in the virtual world and the virtual world only. An example would be video games.

Percentile Efficiency:

Definition: How effective or useful the output is to the total input in any system as a percentile.

 Percentile Effectivity: Definition: Producing and rating a desired effect measured by percentile(s) of how effective the outcome was/is.

How to Measure efficiency in relation to our world?

Using a percentile measurement while acknowledging the boundaries of 0 being completely inefficient (theoretically impossible) as it would then not exist and 100 being perfect efficiency (also theoretically impossible). Therefore, leaving --> 0.x (repeating) % and < -- 99.x (repeating) % as the only logically possible percentiles of measurement for the concept of being right. The same is reversible to analyze a percentile basis for being wrong.

Can an idea or thought be wrong and right by our perception and in terms of efficiency?

Yes and no, it is known as conflict. However, in a 1 on 1 situation of debate, person A thinks they are right and that person B is wrong. Person B thinks they are right and that person A is wrong. In fact, they are arguing about who has a more efficient answer.

Methods of measuring efficiency:

Intuition, 5 human senses, perception, analyzing pros and cons, judging (judgement in general) speed from start to finish, depth perception and an infinite amount of subconscious calculations etc...

Percentile Effectivity:

Producing and rating a desired effect in a percentage of how effective the outcome was/is.

Management:

“The act, manner, or practice of managing; handling, supervision, or controlling effectively”

Therefore is a Globally Positive Efficiency/Effectiveness Management Perspective/G.P.E.E.M.P. the most efficient/effective solution?

The dependent variable would have to be which leader(s) is/are leading. Who on our planet has the highest general intelligence and more importantly understanding the psychological system of the human creation?

1.	Make decision using new age decision theory

2.	Measure effecitivity Make changes accordingly 3.	Measure effectivity Make changes accordingly

4.	Repeat

Personalization

Individual system adaption

The whole point of this system:

After observing life, science, mathematics, historical movies I have come to the same conclusion as many have. There needs to be change.

Advanced Ethical Structure

How humans think: Have a belief, value, idea then decision and or action. Due to our complex nature, emotion is a beautifully conflicting double-edged sword with human logic. Without emotion we would not laugh, cry, hate, love, care etc... Emotions are what make us human. I strongly advise Emotional Intelligence theory to be taught in schools as a mandatory subject.

“Money doesn’t make the world go round, emotionally affected decisions do”

One of many issues:

If person A is aware of knowledge where person B is not, it is logical for person A to take responsibility and to take required action.

'''Personalized Adaptation Effectivity/Efficiency Management Model PAEEMM :'''

Simply put:

Positive Efficiency – affects us in positive ways

Negative Efficiency – affects us in negative ways

OR

High Efficiency - affects us in positive ways

Low Efficiency - affects us in negative ways

AND

Positive Effectivity – end result highly successful

Negative Effectivity – end result highly unsuccessful

OR

High Effectivity - end result highly successful

Low Effectivity - end result highly unsuccessful

CAUTION:

If you are a part of religion or faith and you feel as if it teaches you basically what this ethical structure will then you need not to follow, or even if you feel if this structure is wrong (ineffective/inefficient      ; )      )

Structure of effective/efficiency decision making:

New Age of Decision Theory

One goal: Global systemic progress utilizing positive efficiency and effectivity

6 Golden Questions In no important order, it is purely subjective to the individual 1.	Does it promote positive efficiency/effectivity for your biopsychosocial system?

2.	Does it promote positive efficiency/effectivity for your intended involved individual?

3.	Does it promote positive efficiency/effectivity for your intended surrounding people on a micro scale?

4.	Does it promote positive efficiency/effectivity for your intended surrounding people on a macro scale?

5.	Does it promote positive efficiency/effectivity for your surrounding environment/other life forms on a micro scale?

6.	Does it promote positive efficiency/effectivity for your surrounding environment/other life forms on a macro scale?

In the future...

Added 4 Platinum Questions

7.	Does it promote positive efficiency/effectivity for your surrounding environment on a mega-macro scale? How does your decision affect the solar system?

8.	Does it promote positive efficiency/effectivity for your surrounding environment on a ultra-macro scale? How does your decision affect the galactic system?

9.	Does it promote positive efficiency/effectivity for your surrounding environment on a supreme-macro scale? How does your decision affect the universal system?

10.	Does it promote positive efficiency/effectivity for your surrounding environment on a dimensional-macro scale? How does your decision affect the dimensional system(s)?

Added 1 Godlike Question

11.	Does it promote positive efficiency/effectivity for your surrounding environment on a unknown-micro/macro scale? How does your decision affect the unknown system?

Note:

The higher the decision intelligence, the more questions that one can ask consciously and subconsciously. Most people are consistently inconsistent, utilizing a range of questions from 1-5. Logically, intelligence would then have to be measured at the end of one’s life

Overall, is it effective and efficient?

Without a world of negativity, inefficiency, ineffectivity, I would not have been able to formulate a solution, therefore...

In short, you yourself are a system. Now run your system more efficiently utilizing the (X) questions of your choice.