User:Zha Zha La/Donna Auston/Klw217 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Zha Zha La, Achebbi, Janice.christell


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zha%20Zha%20La/Donna_Auston?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think the lead is the perfect mixture between detailed and concise. It tells some of her career highlights and the topics of her research, without being too wordy and telling too much information. If too much information is mentioned in the lead, there is not enough left over to fill the rest of the article. The "Education" subsection is very well-made and includes a lot of details about her background.

The article does a good job of staying neutral and not taking a side on the issues listed on the article. The subsections about "Publications" is very detailed and does a great job of citing some of her works. Citations are included throughout the article, however when I tried to click on them I could not get to their websites or articles. I don't know if it was error on my part or not. There are a lot of citations throughout the article.

I think that the article is very well-written and is free of obvious spelling or grammatical errors. I think the article is very well-made, however I think a little bit more information could be added about her activism and career/work as a professor. A chart off to the side to organize information about where she is from, how old she is, and her education and occupation could also make the article a little better.