User:Zha Zha La/John L. Jackson Jr./RooftopWriter Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Zha Zha La


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Zha Zha La/John L. Jackson Jr.


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * John L. Jackson Jr.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The introduction is concise and up to date. The information provided is neutral in tone and relevant. The sections make sense and are organized in a way that is easy to understand. It is well written. It looks like you've added a lot to the books and films sections, which is great because now it's a more accurate representation of what he has done so it looks more complete. It looks great.