User:Zijieke/Li Zhi/Randallcj3 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Zijieke)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Zijieke/Li Zhi

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, this is a new article.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is somewhere in the middle.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? I think so
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? It looks like everything is relevant, I don't know whether anything is missing.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I don't think so, it looks pretty neutral
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No I don't believe so

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? It looks like a lot of the articles linked to are good.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? I would bet they are fairly representative
 * Are the sources current? Some are, some about earlier years of his career. I think that is great.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? There are some parts that could use some editing, just a few sentences that feel odd.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes there are a few grammatical errors. For example, In the biography section, it says "he restrained from getting himself involved", maybe just "from getting involved" would sound smoother.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the sections look great

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No
 * Are images well-captioned? No
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? It looks like it as far as I can tell, a lot of the articles I have seen have to do with his removal from the internet in China.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Section headings look good, I would add a photo to the information bar that is on the right. Also, some more information in that bar would be great. I would suggest finding another artist with a wikipedia page you think is well done and using that format.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?There are some links, but I think there could be more to make it more discoverable.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, given that it is a new article, I think it looks pretty good!
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The section about his Banning from China is strong and very informative.
 * How can the content added be improved? I would maybe add some more information about his personal life if it is available and I think that the square lyrics section needs a little bit more explanation for it's relevance in his being banned.

Overall evaluation
I think overall it is pretty good, just some edits that could be made and a little more info to be added but overall I think its good.