User:ZionSmart453/Evaluate an Article

Lead Section


 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes
 * 3) yes
 * 4) lead concise

Content


 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes
 * no
 * 1) The article address topics related to historically underrepresented topics

Tone and Balance


 * 1) yes the article is neutral
 * 2) yes
 * 3) overrepresented
 * 4) yes

Sources and References


 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes
 * 3) there in the middle between current and not
 * 4) yes
 * 5) no
 * 6) yes

Organization and writing quality


 * 1) yes the article is easy to read
 * 2) no the article does not have spelling errors
 * 3) the article is well organized

Images and Media


 * 1) yes the article images helps me understand more
 * 2) yes
 * 3) yes
 * 4) yes

Talk Page Discussion


 * 1) All of this was inserted at Neurodevelopmental disorder, and is off-topic there. I am copying it here in case anything can be incorporated here.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) this article is rated good

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)