User:Zmuri8/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Emotional Intimacy

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Emotional Intimacy is often an overlooked aspect of the human relationships. There is much to consider when talking about emotions and how to express them. Because every human being is different, we need multiple approaches to figure out how to establish emotional connection with someone. This article needs additional sources and restructuring in order to better represent the topic.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic

The lead include a brief description of the article's major sections

The lead does not include information that is not present in the article

The lead concise

Content

The article's content could be more relevant to the topic with more specific details of the concept, not just examples.

The content is up-to-date

There is no content that is missing or content that does not belong

The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? It does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

The article could be more neutral with less examples and more specific explanations

Some claims are biased regarding long - distance relationships and relationships in general

Long - distance relationship is overrepresented

There is no mention of minority or fringe viewpoints

The article does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position

Sources and References

All facts in the article are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information

Are the sources thorough reflect the available literature on the topic

The sources current?

The sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors, but do not include historically marginalized individuals

There should be more sources for this topic

Links are working

Organization and writing quality

The article is concise, clear, and easy to read

The article has no grammatical or spelling errors

The article is well-organized and broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic

Talk page discussion

There is some conversation about the last sentence of the article

The article is Start-class rated? It is a part of Wiki Education Foundation

This article is to general and it needs more references tied to writers and scientists.

Overall impressions

This article is dissent

The article's strengths are well used vocabulary and emotional scale

The article can be improved by adding additional sources and sounding less personal

The article is well-developed but it needs further extension in order to be complete