User:ZombieManF/Linnaeus's two-toed sloth/Binclima811 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ZombieManF


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ZombieManF/Linnaeus's two-toed sloth
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Linnaeus's two-toed sloth

Lead
The lead within the article has not been changed to add any new information, and I believe adding a brief summary of the sections would be beneficial. Everything referenced in the lead makes sense in the context of the article, the opening is strong, and the body of the lead is as concise as I believe it can be.

Content
The content added to the article fits and is relevant to the topic. I think adding a section separate from ecology based on physiology alone would help to add more clarity to what's being added. More content on the physiology would also be helpful, as right now there is not much added information. The added material does not deal with Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance
The tone of the added content is neutral, and does not try to persuade the reader into accepting a particular viewpoint. The views expressed are neither over nor underrepresented.

Sources and References
There are only two sources referenced in the material added, but both are up to date and thorough. The material added to the article reflect the information provided by the sources, and both sources are from a diverse set of authors. I think adding more sources to generate more information on the physiology on Linnaeus's two-toed sloths would be beneficial in this case. Finding information on other aspects of this species would be interesting, such as thermoregulation or water consumption.

Organization
The information added is concise and easy to read. When reading, I saw no spelling or grammatical errors. As I stated before, I think added a separate section on physiology and developing it more may generate more interesting material separate from what I read in the draft.

Images and Media
There is an image present in the current article, and no new images have been added. I think this is ok, but if an image of something like their digestive system is available it would be an interesting addition.

Overall Impressions
I think the content added was very interesting, as I did know about aspects of their physiology such as their methane production. I think if more were added concerning their physiology, it would flesh-out what has already been added. Everything else about the added material, such as the tone and content was very well done.