User:Zospence3/Calliope Street/Trestrotter Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kambeau


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kambeau/Calliope St.


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article was very thorough and subjective but there werent enough sections. there was plenty of information but it was all about one thing and in one space. It was formated correctly and all the links and refernces worked. I would have liked to see more in the info box but other than that, the article was very well constructed.