User:Zrivera5/Gabriela González/Johann Estrada Peer Review

Lead: The lead hasn't been update, as far as I can see, but the already existing lead is already well done. It clearly introduces the topic, Gabriela Gonzalez, and does talk about some details from major parts of the article. It doesn't have any information that isn't in the article. It is also concise.

Content: From looking at the outline, it does look like some new information will be added. It should be up-to-date, since the person is planning to interview Gabriela directly. The outline looks like it is going to go through a lot of information, so it doesn't look like it's going to leave anything out.

Tone and Balance: There isn't a tone or balance, since it's just an outline so far.

Sources: Since this person is planning on asking Gabriela questions directly, the source sounds solid and reliable.

Organization: From the looks of the outline, it looks very well organized. It should follow the outline.

Images: Nothing yet.

Overall Impression: This article looks like it's going to be good. Going as far as to ask questions to Gabriela directly, this person will be able to contribute to the original article very well, and improve it nicely.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Zrivera5


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zrivera5/Gabriela_González?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gabriela González

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)