User:Ztelford/sandbox

= Article Evaluation = Chosen Article: Criticism of technology

The article manages to remain on topic for the duration with little deviation from the source topic. The sources used are all within the last 10 years save one of them but appears to be heavily biased toward the negative. Understandably it is an article based around the criticism of technology but it also ignores the benefits it has had for society. There is zero representation for the benefits but again that is simply due to the articles premise. The citations on the page work and only have a few missing. The sources themselves have a strong bias towards the downsides of technology and aren't all that reliable. The talk page houses a number of people that are clearly unsatisfied with the current workings of the article and insist it is more a gathering of complaints than anything else.

Week 3:

Chosen Article: Human Ecology

Missing information regarding the Human Ecology Review journal.

The Human Ecology Review is a journal published twice annually by the Society for Human ecology. The journal features research and theories on the interaction between humans and their environment and the links between culture and nature.

Week Five - Sources
Chosen Article (Final) - History of medicine

References for later:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513889/

https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/world-war-two/medicine-and-world-war-two/

https://www.todayswoundclinic.com/articles/history-wound-care-solution-sepsis-carrel-dakin-method