User:Ztyler460/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: The Storm (short story)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: I chose this article to evaluate because it is one of my favorite stories my class has read this semester and it was interesting to see what other people would write about the story without a bias.


 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * The article is rated as a Stub-class which means it needs improvement. It is part of a wikiproject called WikiProject Women writers.
 * Are there inaccuracies in the plot summary?
 * There are no inaccuracies in the plot summary; however, it could be more detailed when it comes to the affair and the ending.
 * Are exact words from the story used without quotation marks?
 * No, all the quotes have quotation marks.
 * Are quotations not integrated or integrated poorly?
 * Quotes seem to be integrated poorly. Some quotes repeat themselves many times and aren't elaborated upon after being written.
 * Is there too much quoted material used?
 * I don't think there is enough quoted material being used.
 * Is the structure of the page confusing or ineffective?
 * The structure of the page works for the article topic.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Did anything distract you?
 * Everything in the article seems relevant and explores multiple viewpoints.
 * Is the information neutral and factual? Does the article contain any interpretation?
 * All the information is neutral and factual. There doesn't seem to be a bias. The article has a section that explorers critics interpretations.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claim in question?
 * The links to the citations do work but some sources come from sketchy websites that don't seem completely reliable.
 * Is anything missing that could be added? Is there anything that could be removed?
 * There are a of details missing when it comes to the section about analyzing the story and when the authors try to support something they're saying. I think more quotes should be added and analyzed.