User:Zverdin/Membrane transport protein/Amisere Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Zverdin


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Membrane transport protein
 * Membrane transport protein

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think this was a good article to edit and the edits can easily be rationalized. There were not really any updates to the lead; however, I would have maybe listed some of the examples of membrane transport proteins discussed throughout the article to make the different sections more cohesive. The lead gives a good overview though, so I understand leaving it alone.

There were no tone issues I could detect throughout the article. Since it is on just a part of a cell and not a person, it was easy to keep bias out of the article; therefore, no issues with tone. Some of the organization did not really make sense to me. The change between presenting the information in paragraph style to then changing to bullet points through the lower examples in the articles. The content was up to date.

The new sources add reliability as most of the information comes from textbooks or peer reviewed journal articles; however, many of them are more than 15 years old. The information has most likely not changed dramatically as it is cell biology, but I definitely think some more recent sources could have been found. Also, the last two sources (numbers 26 and 27) do not have links with them to look further at the source like the other sources have.

The images added were awesome. I appreciated that they were hand drawn and were very informative toward the the different examples provided in the article. The positive with self-sourced images is that they follow all of the image publishing rules.

I think overall these were great changes to the article. The extra examples were well explained and add to the overall understanding of membrane transport protein. I did not like how the article went from paragraphs to bullet points and I think changing that to make it more fluid throughout the article would be an excellent next step, but overall the article was well edited.