User:Zxmaria/The Little Mermaid (1989 film)/Hadasam Peer Review

General info
Zxmaria Ivitello
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ivitello/sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The Little Mermaid (1989 film)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article has been updated to reflect on new content. The article includes a topic sentences that gives an idea of what the article is going to discuss. The topic sentence is concise and clear. It includes new information that the article did not have before. It includes thorough information about each of thee topics discussed. The information added is relevant to an environmental aspect of the movie. All the content is divided into sections that makes the article easy to read. However, the article does not include a title that gives the topic of the added sections. The article talks about underrepresented topic and all the information portrayed is relevant to the topic. The content that is added is neutral and it is not biased in any way. The topics that are discussed are not over presented. The content in this article does not attempt to persuade the reader in any way. The content in this article is backed up and has reliable sources. The sources are written by a diverse spectrum of author and are good sources.The content in the article reflect what the cited sources say. The sources included are thorough and seem like reliable sources. The links provided are organised and work. The article is well written, organised and easy to read. It doesn't have major grammatical errors and it is broken down into sections that make the article easy to read. The article does not include images yet. Thee article is well written, it has the correct citations and it is very easy to read. The article seems complete, but could have more examples and titles or subtitles could be added to have a clear idea about the section. Overall, the article seems complete and well done.