User:Zy175311460/Ambivalent sexism/Bibliography

You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.

Outline of proposed changes
My topic is Ambivalent sexism

This topic is important is because of ambivalent sexism lies in its ability to highlight two types of sexism: hostile sexism, which is overtly cruel, and benign sexism, which appears kind but is actually destructive. It clarifies how both sorts undermine gender equality and maintain women's subordinate status in society. Women's opportunities in life are restricted by even the "nice" sexism, which hinders their ability to be viewed as equals.

It does have wiki pages covering with it.

Detailed Study of Sexism in Political Contexts: Source 1 offered information that could be further investigated into the ways that ambivalent sexism affected political views and actions throughout major political events.

Empirical Evidence on Sexism and Violence: There is much need for investigation into the connection between attitudes toward violence and ambiguous sexism, as described in Source 2, particularly with regard to the effects on society.

The Effects of Sexism on Career Outcomes: To give a thorough understanding of the professional ramifications of ambivalent sexism, it would be helpful to expand on the insights from Source 3 regarding how it impacts career trajectories and success.

For first source that I find, this improvement idea focuses on how ambivalent sexism influenced political participation in the context of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.

For second source that I find, this improvement idea emphasizes exploring how both hostile and benevolent sexism independently affect attitudes towards male-to-female violence.

For the third source that I find, this improvement idea suggestion is about investigating how personal endorsement of hostile and benevolent sexism affects individuals' career paths.

The main points made on the page about ambivalent sexism include its definition as a theory with two components: hostile and benevolent sexism, developed by social psychologists Peter Glick and Susan Fiske. It discusses how these forms of sexism reinforce traditional gender roles and preserve patriarchal structures, impacting women's social status and opportunities. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) is mentioned as a tool to measure these attitudes. The page also touches on critiques of the ASI and its cross-cultural validity, highlighting the widespread impact of ambivalent sexism across different societies.

The three sources is provided above in the references section.