User:Zzhao123/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Mass communication

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

The reason I chose this article to evaluate is because my major is communication, so this article has a lot of knowledge that is relevant to my major. Secondly, it was important because it allowed me to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the structure of mass communication and how to make better use of it. My first impression of it was that I found it very practical because it not only taught me about the different types of mass communication, but also introduced me to various aspects of how mass media can be valuable in different areas of society. It also gave me a deeper understanding of what communication is all about.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.） The introductory section of this article focuses on the definition of mass communication, its role, and the many ways of communication. At the same time, the introduction contains the content of what is going to be said. Secondly, all the contents of the article are related to its topic, focusing on the different fields of study of mass media and how the different mass communication approaches can be of value. The article does not address one of Wikipedia's equity gaps, nor does it address historically underrepresented populations or topics. Third, this article presents mass communication very pertinently and does not appear to favor one particular position in an attempt to convince readers to support or abandon another position explicitly. The article is as comprehensive as possible in its presentation of mass communication, and there are a few marginal points of view that the authors present in detail, so the article is very pertinent. In terms of sources and citations, all the facts in the article are supported by reliable secondary sources of information. In addition to that, the sources react to the existing literature on the subject and they remain valid. Finally, in terms of images and media, this article is not accompanied by appropriate images. Overall, the state of this article is very good. Secondly, it is an article that contributes to a better perception of the value of mass communication. Through this article, people will be able to better understand what mass communication is and have a deeper knowledge of mass communication. I think that this article can be a list of columns that can be used when studying different communication fields and theories to enhance the authenticity of the article.