User talk:!!

dude
what happened to !!? Decora (talk) 00:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Probably Requests for comment/Durova and Requests for arbitration/Durova came too late. --76.199.103.49 (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks like he'dd had enough and just left: I would have done the same probably. Or of course he could have done what ArbCom suggested and is starting fresh with a new username. It looks like it was exceptionallu sad what happened. I still don't know why he was blocked in the first place anyway. 95jb14 (talk) 19:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The Register has an article on this case. --76.201.142.180 (talk) 20:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Emily Benn
I have nominated Emily Benn, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Emily Benn&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  21:41, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Emily Benn


A tag has been placed on Emily Benn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Njavallil ... Talk 2 Me  20:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 7 January 2012
I think hat it's not fair and sad how they blocked !! and I thought I could edit his page because I wanna secretly unblock him but I have to be a bloody administrator to do it so I was just wondering: How do I become an administrator?

--John Smith 19:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

John Smith 19:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you're talking about, but to become an admin you make several thousand productive efforts over a period of at least 6 months, stay out of trouble and put in a request at WP:RFA. And please sign your comments properly using -- Jac 16888  Talk 19:23, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

I doubt this will get answered but,if i go to user !! then a get a picture of a rainbow bird and why i should hit him with a hammer. What? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goglogo2 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

This is just sarcasm, Goglogo2 :P Cyklopas (talk) 18:33, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Original User Page
I have noticed that the link at the bottom for the original user page is just the current page. Is this intentional? George8211 (talk) 16:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
An article a day keeps the not smart robots away.--Kwabmn2602098 (talk) 15:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Kwabmn2602098 (talk) 13:50, 16 April 2014 (UTC) 

Seven years
Your last contributions to Wikipedia were made on this date seven years ago. By coincidence I came across this. Best wishes. -- hmich 176 01:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
for being the first user that was searched

Creeper919 (talk) 02:52, 11 December 2014 (UTC) 

Can anyone explain?
Why is this guy accused of a sock puppet even though he left in 2007? Ritabile (talk) 17:45, April 16, 2015 (UTC)it's ! Not!! The one who is sockpuppet

Hello, !! You Have A Kitten From 73.7.81.126 (talk) 20:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)!
Why hello, !! How's it going? I have 2 things for you:

1) The Rainbow Hummingbird of Love

2) ANOTHER kitten!

Well, I am happy if you still view your page, and I can hopefully help you get a new lease on Wikipedian life!

From, 73.7.81.126 (talk) 20:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Ouch
That sockpuppet notice on the userpage was harsh, don't you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pink Saffron (talk • contribs) 01:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Apparently, it is not really a sockpuppet notice, it was his block reason in a whole controversy (link from "dude" discussion) that happened (see user page edit history).2804:14D:7684:8C05:7977:F762:CE5E:6B9D (talk) 02:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC)