User talk:!rehtom

Welcome!
Hello, !rehtom, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Mother!, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 23:04, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Fred. The page I have been editing is for the film. "mother!" The cultural conversation about this film is how polarizing it is. The studio releasing the film states that the top critics support the film, while the general public despises it. They are using that statement of why the film is significant. While there is some truth to this statement, there is also some gray areas absent. For instance, some of the nation's top critics (New Yorker, NY Magazine, Washington Post, Entertainment Weekly etc.), much like the public, have dismissed the film altogether. My edit was meant to take the comparison out of the B&W hyperbole of Paramount's marketing team and place the conversation in a more realistic place.

The repeated reverts by Sebastian James with criteria based on everything from "It's not like everyone is talking about this film with very polarizing reviews" to "Learn how to write a film article, and then revert my edit!" misrepresent the film and the cooperative nature of editing an article using logic. Sebastian James has also reverted Koavf repeatedly with little or no explanation. It appears that Sebastian James may have a conflict of interest with this title. He was blocked for using a proxy and claimed it was because of a repressive government. Perhaps this is true. But he is not behaving that way. He is behaving like a studio troll. !rehtom (talk) 13:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)!rehtom

What?
You added the critical responses for the film mother! on Darren Aronofsky article. Bu now, you show it like I did?! Do not send me a message, and learn about Wikipedia before doing edits. Sebastian James (talk) 17:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)