User talk:*AirportUpdater*/2016/May

Service Expansion and Prospective New Airlines/Routes
I think you should provide an additional section to this page, (Either with "Expansion of International Service" or after you list all the passenger airlines), that updates the readers on service expansion, and prospective airlines for Logan Airport. There is so much going on with this airport, as well as ambitious projects by Massport, that the airport is experiencing unprecedented growth, and in fact, I believe that by year end 2016, the traffic numbers will exceed aviation analyst's expectations of 36 million passengers, and actually be somewhere between 36-37 million.

Just to give you a few examples of "Expansion of Current Service":

Cathay Pacific: Expanding service from 4 flights/week to 5 flights/week (begins May 5)- 25% increase in seats on BOS-HKG route Link--> http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cathay-pacific-increases-boston-flights-from-four-to-five-per-week-300210783.html

Copa Airlines: Resuming daily service, up from 5 flights/week currently to Panama City (begins June 1) Link--> http://airlineroute.net/2015/11/05/cm-bos-mar16/

Icelandair: Expanding service from Boston-Reykjavic; using 767-300ER 1x daily (begins May 15; ends May 22); Icelandair increases frequencies to 3x daily (begins May 23)

Japan Airlines: Up-gauging service from a 787-8 to 787-9 (Begins June 11)- 5% increase in seats and will be the first plane flown to North America with JAL's upgraded Business Class product Link--> http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.com/2016/01/21/japan-airlines-boston-upgrade/

jetBlue: Increasing flight frequency on BOS-BWI route from 6-7 flights/day (begins May 5) Link--> http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2016/03/02/jetblue-pushes-daily-boston-havana-flights.html

jetBlue: Adding 1 additional daily flight frequency on BOS-CLE (begins May 4)- Will total 3 flights/day. Service commenced 12 months ago with 2 daily flights; rapidly expanding due to jetBlue's major network in Boston, demand for additional seats to BOS/CLE, as well as feed to/from international codeshare partners Link--> http://www.cleveland.com/travel/index.ssf/2016/04/jetblue_adds_third_flight_to_b.html

jetBlue: Expanding flight frequency to 6 flights/day on BOS-RDU route; up from 5 flights/day (begins May 5) Link--> https://book.jetblue.com/B6/AirFareFamiliesFlexibleForward.do (If you look at forward booking on jetBlue site, 6th flight becomes available from May 5, 2015)

jetBlue: Adding 1 additional daily flight frequency on BOS-FLL (begins May 5) (Additional flight frequencies being added to Orlando, Tampa, San Juan, Raleigh/Durham, New York (JFK) and Cleveland) Link--> http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jetblue-adds-new-service-to-puerto-rico-from-fort-lauderdale-hollywood-and-continues-baltimore-growth-2015-12-21, http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/jetblue-adds-new-service-puerto-rico-from-fort-lauderdale-hollywood-continues-baltimore-nasdaq-jblu-2083879.htm

jetBlue: On Boston-Tampa route; adding 1 additional daily flight 3 days/week (Thursday, Saturday, Sunday)- 5 flights/day 3 days/week--> 31 flights/week (begins October 6); 1 additional daily flight for 5 flights/day 4 days/week (Monday, Thursday, Saturday, Sunday)--> 32 flights/week (begins October 10)

(Additional flight frequencies being added from Boston to Baltimore, Orlando, Tampa, San Juan, Ft. Lauderdale, Raleigh/Durham, New York (JFK) and Cleveland; and additional weekend flights between Boston and: Barbados (d), Aruba, Cancun, Turks and Caicos, Punta Cana, St. Maarten and Liberia, Costa Rica (d)) Link--> http://finance.yahoo.com/news/jetblue-deepens-commitment-boston-no-100000380.html

jetBlue: Increases frequencies and expands seasonal service for Boston to Port-au-Prince flights; 3 weekly flights (begins June 4, ends October 15)--> In 2015, Boston to Port-au-Prince was 2 weekly flights, and began June 17, ending September 5. In 2016, expansion of this route will add more than 50,000 additional seats to this market, from 2015 capacity on BOS-PAP route. Link--> http://www.bostonhaitian.com/2015/jetblue-add-more-boston-haiti-flights-next-year

Norwegian Air Shuttle: Increases frequency on Boston-Oslo flight to 2 weekly, currently 1 weekly (begins May 13) Link--> http://airlineroute.net/2015/12/08/dy-bos-s16update2/

"Prospective New Airlines/Routes

Aer Lingus: Airline is looking into using Airbus A321LR aircraft and establish service between Boston and Cork, obviously to compete directly with NAI's flight. A321LRs will not be coming out until 2019, so it is expected service would't start until then. Link--> http://www.independent.ie/business/aer-lingus-eyes-corkus-service-with-new-jets-says-iag-boss-34679697.html

Air India: Boston, along with few other US cities, is currently being considered and studied by Air India. India is currently working to establish a US Customs pre-check facility at one of it's airports. If the facility is established, demand for direct flights to the US is expected to increase, according to Indian aviation and government authorities. Also, Air India's return to solvency and financial success within the last couple of years have made destinations such as Washington D.C., Houston and Boston more practical, using 787-8 aircraft. Link--> http://m.timesofindia.com/india/Air-India-seeks-US-pre-clearance-travel-facility-at-Delhi-Mumbai-airports/articleshow/47636842.cms

EVA Air: Boston is mentioned by EVA Air officials as being a North American city that the airline is considering in its future US expansion. The airline has not yet analyzed route feasibility, however, they state that Boston is a city they would like to explore providing direct service to from Taipei. Link--> https://centreforaviation.com/analysis/eva-air-plans-more-long-haul-destinations-while-growing-short-haul-and-consolidating-with-uni-air-258894

jetBlue: New daily service to Havana--> jetBlue plans to service this route with Airbus A320 aircraft, and begin flights by Sept. 8, 2016 or within 100 days after receipt of all necessary approvals, whichever is earlier. Link--> http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2016/03/02/jetblue-pushes-daily-boston-havana-flights.html

Norwegian Air Shuttle: Ambitious route development and expansion out of Boston to Western Europe has been expressed by Norwegian Air Shuttle executives as key to the development of their transatlantic service. It has been suggested, by Norwegian CEO Bjorn Kjos, that Boston serves as a favorable US destination for flights to several points throughout Western Europe due to Boston being the most eastern major US city that is within enough distance using narrow body aircraft to cities throughout Ireland, the UK, Denmark, France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, etc. Destinations on the map from Boston include: Birmingham, England; Edinburgh, Scotland; Glasgow, Scotland; Milan, Italy; Barcelona, Spain; Madrid, Spain; Paris, France; Dublin Ireland, Belfast, Ireland, Stockholm, Sweden; along with many others. Norwegian's position is that these flights may start as early as 2017 or 2018; once the airline starts receiving the 737MAX. Links--> http://www.bostonherald.com/business/business_markets/2015/10/norwegian_air_spreads_its_wings_at_logan, http://content.yudu.com/A3w7e6/030915/resources/index.htm?referrerUrl=

Norwegian Air Shuttle: NAI, Norwegian's Irish subsidiary, is expected to announce the establishment of service from Boston to Shannon, Ireland if NAI's Foreign Air Carrier Permit receives final approval from the USDOT. It has been published that Shannon International Airport has finalized an agreement with Norwegian that NAI will begin direct flights to Boston, provided that NAI is granted final approval from USDOT. Flights from Shannon to Boston would be served with Boeing 737-800 aircraft. No firm start date or service frequency have been established yet. Link--> http://clareherald.com/2016/03/shannon-confirms-deal-with-norwegian-air-75391/, http://clareherald.com/2016/03/shannon-confirms-deal-with-norwegian-air-75391/, http://clareherald.com/2016/04/airline-ceo-committed-to-shannon-us-services-27909/

-Aside from the prospective airlines and routes detailed above, Massport has several airlines and destinations on their radar that they are trying to court for future service. International destinations and likely airlines to serve the routes consist of the following:

-Seoul, Korea (Korean Air) -Delhi/Mumbai, India (Air India/Jet Airways) -Sao Paulo, Brazil (LATAM Airlines/Azul Airlines) -Bogota, Columbia (Avianca) -San Jose, Costa Rica (jetBlue/Avianca) -Vancouver, Canada (Air Canada/WestJet) -Milan, Italy (Alitalia/Norwegian Air Shuttle) -Barcelona, Spain (Norwegian Air Shuttle)
 * The Spanish government has a bureaucratic law in place that does not permit Spanish national carriers to fly international destinations from Barcelona. (During my Spanish masters program, I learned this in a Spanish Politics class, taught by a professor from Barcelona, during my MA program.) This legislature is in place due to the competition between the governments in Madrid and Barcelona. The Spanish government in Madrid enforces this in order to keep Madrid one step ahead of Barcelona on an international scale. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.177.236.154 (talk) 05:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * While there is a fairly large amount of new destinations coming into Boston, I don't think a new section is necessary stating what new flights there are. That's what the destination tables are for. When a new flight is announced, it is placed on the table under its designated airline. You could include a couple sentences or an additional paragraph possibly in the "Expansion of International Service" section and state some examples, but an entire list in my opinion isn't necessary. Every airport is expanding in flights, some even greater than Boston. I just think this is well represented in the destination tables where anyone can see that the flights are growing. They are also showed in the statistics sections of every page with growing numbers every year. Thanks for the comment. &#42;AirportUpdater* (talk) 19:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Allegiant and American at PIT.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Allegiant and American at PIT.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:United Airlines Takeoff.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:United Airlines Takeoff.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Concourse B.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Concourse B.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Southwest Airlines at PIT.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Southwest Airlines at PIT.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Delta planes at PIT.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Delta planes at PIT.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Frontier Airlines at PIT.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Frontier Airlines at PIT.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from Wikipedia. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Discussion regarding images on PIT airport's page

 * Stefan, all of these images were created by someone from Pittsburgh International Airport and is uploading them on their social media platforms. They are free to use everywhere. Anyone can copy and paste those images and use them for themselves (retweet for example). There are no copyright issues with SOCIAL MEDIA. I do not see your problem. Regarding the Thanksgiving Day image, I haven't used that since last November and was never planning to use it again, you can delete it if it still exists somewhere. Don't make problems out of nothing when its perfectly fine. If you don't think the images I uploaded are good for some reason, you try finding pictures of Pittsburgh International Airport that are. I bet you won't. I'm simply just improving the page by including images of airplanes taken by the airport itself that are meant for everyone to see how the progress is coming. &#42;AirportUpdater* (talk) 04:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * There is no evidence that the images are 'free to use everywhere'. Pictures on social media platforms are normally unfree unless they were published more than 95 years ago or the photographer died more than 70 years ago, but that doesn't seem to be the case here as these are colour photos and unlikely to be a century old or so. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Stefan2 is correct. You cannot assume the images are freely licensed just because they are on social media. Your intentions to improve the articles with imagery is noted and appreciated, but you have to respect copyright as there are legal concerns. In a nutshell, you should assume the works are copyrighted unless explicitly noted otherwise. A simple Google image search filtering as "labeled for reuse" yields many photos, including media from our own Commons project. You should still double-check to ensure the media is under a compatible license. Another great place to look is on Flickr, where you can filter images by "commercial use allowed" . Hope this helps &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  17:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * How do you suppose I get these images approved then? I don't want them to get deleted off the page, they are good pictures that represent the airport well. &#42;AirportUpdater* (talk) 20:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The copyright holder(s) should follow the process described at WP:CONSENT. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * This is impossible. There's no way I can get them to fill this out. Can't I just tweet them asking if I can use their tweeted photos on the Pittsburgh International Airport's Wikipedia page? This would be much easier and I'm sure they'd agree this way. &#42;AirportUpdater* (talk) 21:11, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this author truly intends to release these to the public domain (meaning anyone can use the for any reason at all, including reselling them) they could include a public domain release statement where ever they are publishing them, something like "This picture was taken by  and is released to the public domain".  I can't imagine this has to be unnecessarily difficult for the author - any reason we wouldn't accept something like that? —  xaosflux  Talk 22:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * A permission which restricts the use to Wikipedia's article titled Pittsburgh International Airport would be insufficient, see db-f3. Assuming that the copyright holder is the Facebook account holder and that this person wants the files to be freely licensed, then the Facebook user could include a statement about this on the Facebook pages. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

World map showing direct and future destinations
Hi AirportUpdater, I wanted to ask your thought on adding maps showing direct and future destination from a certain airport. You can see my example in Juan Santamar%C3%ADa International Airport in Costa Rica. I think is a good visual reference for users.

Please let me know your thought, and if this need to be brought to the community. Cheers, Luiscotiquicia (talk) 20:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Maps are a good feature to have on airport pages as they do show the destinations for a particular airport in a "world" view. However, the reason I think your map was deleted was because it was a bit too large and included some unnecessary info. I think if a smaller map showing the current destinations was created, that could work. It would have to be a thumbnail image. A good example of this type of map(s) is shown on Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport's airport page right next to the destinations chart. If you created something like this, that would definitely work for Juan Santamar%C3%ADa International Airport. Happy editing! &#42;AirportUpdater* (talk) 23:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, I followed your advice about the thumbnail images, and made the appropriate updates in Juan Santamar%C3%ADa International Airport. Hopefully they won´t be deleted.
 * Thanks for the advice! I appreciate your help! Cheers, Luiscotiquicia (talk) 21:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Great job with the maps! Those should work fine. &#42;AirportUpdater* (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)