User talk:*CBrinkley911

Proposed deletion of Dr. linda f. williams


The article Dr. linda f. williams has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Linda F. Williams
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page Linda F. Williams, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the [//www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GNU Free Documentation License], Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Your sandbox had the same content and has also been deleted for the same reason.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:07, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I received a notification that you sent me an email, but when I went to my email I did not find one. Note that there is a long-standing problem with Yahoo! email addresses, that b/c of a security protocol they use, they will always fail when sent secondarily through Wikipedia's email system. Anyway, I like to keep things transparent–most emails I get from here I think should have been posted on-wiki anyway.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Final warning
And now I see you reposted the copyright violation. I have deleted it again. This is a final warning. The next time you post copyrighted content to Wikipedia you will be subject to an immediate block from further editing.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I got a notification again that you sent me an email, and once again, received no email. As I explained, I thought it might be that you are using a Yahoo! email address through our system which has problems. That's just a guess but regardless, I am not receiving them when I look at my email. So I have no idea what it said, but if it's about the issue here, all I can tell you is what I said here and at the Teahouse. You must not copy and paste previously written content in attempting to write an article. Also that any proper attempt at writing an article will need to demonstrate that the subject is notable by citations to reliable, secondary and independent sources that treat the topic in substantive detail, and also that any article needs to be written in a non-promotional manner (the LinkdIn text you've infringed multiple times now, was highly promotional).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)