User talk:*Paul*

Hi *Paul*, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:


 * Welcome, newcomers - a general introduction, and a good starting point
 * The help centre and FAQs
 * The Manual of Style - a guide to the community's writing conventions

It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.

When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~. (Just so you know, some people won't pay attention to unsigned comments).

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.

Above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!


 * Thanks for volunteering to help with the AFL scores, and thanks for all your hard work maintaing the scores website! How is it that you came across us? It seems very fortuitous! All the same, once you get the hang of Wiki-editing in general, just use the template I made and fill-in-the-blanks to add more season articles. Feel free to add more information than what we're adding now - the rough plan was to get the basics (ladder etc) in first.

– &#9608; T  &#9608; P &#9608; K &#9608;  11:49, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Australian Football League season 1970
Looks good, the round-by-round stats are what we were aiming for. It just needs some formatting, like links for the various venues, dates; some 'wrapper' text to introduce it, and the things like overall attendance and medal winners that are in the other articles. The actual tables look great. Don't stress about the format too much though, just take your time to get used to Wikidom and everything will fall into place! Thanks. &#9608; T &#9608; P &#9608; K &#9608;  07:53, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

email to the FIT
Hello i'm a french player, in my country our sport is calling touch rugby. I work on wikipedia did you know that encyclopedia. We have a problem to name our sport and of course to name the article: Touch rugby, touch football (rugby league).

The principal argument of the touch football (rugby league) is the sport created in australia and in australia you call that sport touch football

You can see the discution on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Touch_rugby for touch rugby http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Touch_football_%28rugby_league%29 for touch football (rugby league)

Can you help us please(sorry for my english) Quentin Goldensun 18:28, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

User Categorization
You were listed on the Wikipedians/Australia page as living in or being associated with the Australian Capital Territories. As part of the User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in ACT for instructions. Rmky87 22:18, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

You
I wish to interview you, or atleast find out your life story, and some other things. I am trying to research all about humankind and all types of peoples. I have randomly chosen you, if you wish to comply to this, it can be done in secrecy through e-mail, or easily on the talk pages, which ever is easiest for you. But if you don't like this idea, then tell me on talk page. Privat e   Butcher  01:15, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Thank you



 * Paul, I came here to say thanks also, but see that Stephen has beaten me to it by a few days. Your work in keeping these lists up to date is fantastic and really appreciated.  All the best. -- Ian &equiv; talk 08:32, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Nero's verify results
Hi, is it true that Nero's verify results are inaccurate? Shawnc 19:45, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Interesting results. Thanks for the info. Shawnc 18:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Cricket win percentage
Hello Paul,

I hesitate to criticise anything you do with List of Test cricket records and List of One-day International records, but I'm just wondering why you changed the definition of win percentage. To me, counting a tie the same as a loss seems wrong. Was it just for convenience? It's surely easy to calculate it either way, isn't it?

Thanks,

Stephen Turner (Talk) 15:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

WikiProjects
Hi Paul! You have done some great work on cricket, Australian rules and rugby league. You are always welcome to join WikiProject AFL, WikiProject Cricket and WikiProject Rugby league. Help is always needed and appreciated! Thanks  Da Gizza  Chat (c) 08:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Cricket updates
Your update of the List of Australian Test cricketers has edited out a number of amendments we have to names to make sure the list is pointing in the right direction (see ). Could you amend your update program to take account of this? Many thanks, jguk 17:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I should have noted that it's great to see you updating them. Is it your intention to regularly update all these lists, or just the Aussie ones? jguk 18:02, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Cricket biographies
It's great to see more cricket biographies being created (even if they are of Australians! :) ). Could I ask that you add references for what you're adding (eg have a references section listing the Cricinfo or CricketArchive page, or whatever books you are using) and also to place the cricketers in their own categories. Cheers, jguk 15:04, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Apologies.
I've put this here, in case you don't notice it on Talk:The Goodies. I didn't mean to overwrite your edit. I started an edit session before you did, and didn't get around to writing and saving the comment until after you had. I didn't even know it'd happened until you made your second comment.--Drat (Talk) 11:57, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Cricket biographies
Hello Paul! Nice to see you templating pages about Cricketers. Could you please add their birth and death categories? I have done this for some of your recent creations but I would rather that you get in to the habit. Regards, -- (aeropagitica) 14:31, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello again! Thanks for tweaking your program to include birth and death categories, the entries are more consistent with other biographical stubs now.  Best wishes, -- (aeropagitica) [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg|25px|UK]] 10:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

I see you're nearly at the end of the Aussies - I do hope you'll move onto the Lists of Test cricketers of other nations, jguk 18:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: More sub-stubs
Hi Paul, thanks for your message. I think all cricket biographies should have at a minimum: full name, including middle names; date and place of birth; date of death if applicable; the fact the person was a cricketer; some information about their career; a References section (all Wikipedia articles should have one of these), usually including a Cricinfo link generated by the {&#123;cricinfo}} template; categories for all the teams they played for; and {&#123;cricketbio-stub}} if it's a short article. The infobox is nice, but I don't always bother for very short articles. I hope that's helpful! Stephen Turner (Talk) 13:51, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Paul, When you get a chance, could you merge a couple of my biographies, AM Smith and Timothy Andrew Lloyd, into yours- they have quite alot of background info which might be useful. Thanks, rob77

WP:AFL
Hi Paul, was wondering if you are interested in joining WikiProject AFL. I noticed that you have a link to Rleague on your userpage, is that the site that you personally run? Rogerthat 03:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Let me just say that is a brilliant site. I use it extensively on this site when creating player profiles - if you look at many pages on here (i'll give you some examples - Rory Hilton, Nathan Buckley, Anthony Rocca)) they all have links to the player's stats page on Rleague AFL Tables.


 * Also, do you plan to add any statistics prior to the 1993 season on your site? Rogerthat 03:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * That's fair enough, the main reason I asked is to fill in details of players like James Hird and Peter Riccardi, who debuted in 1992 or prior. Perhaps if you could tell me the dates of their debut (date, ground, round, versus, etc) for certain articles you come across.

Also do you think it would be worthwhile to have pages such as List of AFL players to have played more than 300 games, considering your site already covers this? You can always convert your HTML tables easily by using this site. Cheers, Rogerthat 03:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Can I sign my name at the bottom of Roger's "Let me just say that is a brilliant site" too? It has been helping me in my tipping comps for years. Drew (Snottygobble | Talk) 04:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Drew. This season it will be 8 years old. --Paul 04:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Yeah I don't see much point myself in totalling the results for every season of AFL when Rleague and allthestats have that covered. But I think we should at least include some of the key records, such as games record holders at each club perhaps? If we want to include stuff on here it should at the least combine two sources. I suggest we get all the AFL Draft details up as well, at the moment I've only got the 1998 AFL Draft (which, BTW, I found printed out a couple of weeks ago when I conducted a house cleanout). Rogerthat 04:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the stubs!
These will come in handy, as they are much better than the ones I was generating. On most of the bios I'm doing, I'm trying to add a bit more color for at least the better known cricketers and hopefully one day all... my theory being that there has to be something interesting in any man's life which merits inclusion in a bio. This, of course, is a lot of work and it's not possible to automate, and the stubs you sent me can be a good start in probably every case. Ok if I start uploading some of them to the undone Windies cricketers?

Also, might I ask how you've been generating these files? I have tried a couple of things, including Excel, but the results have been less than satisfatory. I guess in theory one could write a Perl script (or similar) off the raw data on the list of cricketers page, but I didn't want to get into all that right now... it's been a while since I've used that kind of language (I just write a bunch of C code these days) and I know I'd have to get back up to speed. --Deville 15:21, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Good enough, maybe one day I'll try and write some code for some of these other country's player pages, or maybe if people decide we need all the series pages. I did some VB back in the day, but it's been a while.  ;-)  Anyway, I think I'll make some more bios later today, and I'll just add on to some of the stubs you sent me, if that's ok. --Deville 18:11, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Vegan Vandal
The Vegan Vandal, for what it's worth. I was just saying that I think it's OK to throw the baby out with the bathwater in a case like this -- yes, s/he makes some legitimate (if usually pretty trivial) edits on cricket subjects, but the vast majority of his/her work is tedious, malicious vandalism and I revert on sight.

Best -- Ben-w 06:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

deletion?
Hey, should we then delete Winston White?
 * I put it up on AfD, I imagine it should disappear in the next few days. Thanks for fixing this! --Deville 16:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

A random little thanks...
Hi *Paul*, I've been watching the New Pages for a while and have seen a lot of your contributions on it. Just want to extend a little thanks for your dedication to wikipedia at all hours (or so it seems). Anabanana459 07:10, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Well done! Johnlp 17:00, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Non Test ODI template
Yeah tell me what you think? Is it necessary or should we just edit the existing ones. The problem it I found existing ones a bit unsuited and editing them cumbersome. I fixed the Test/First class mismatch on the template though. Lesliestng 02:23, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:2003CanberraBushfires.jpg
Hey, I was just browsing around and I noticed this picture. It's really amazing. Thanks for a great contribution. :) pfctdayelise (translate?) 11:39, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Infobox Cricket
Thank you for your appericiation. -- Shyam ( T / C ) 18:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:MaryKostikidis.jpg
To get the filename fixed, you can simply re-upload it at the new name and then tag the file with the misspelling with. enochlau (talk) 13:53, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

John Price
Hello, can you please WP:CITE your sources for the John Price article you created? Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 12:25, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * My eyes just aren't what they used to be. :-)  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 20:05, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Kenyan ODI Bios
Hi Paul! Seems like we both can share the stubmaster title!! Anyway while creating the Kenyan stubs I noticed that none of the players have infoboxes( except the stubs I have now created). Even players like Maurice Odumbe & Steve Tikolo dont have infoboxes. Can you do something about it?

Thanks

Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  ) '' 06:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Jason Taylor (Australian rules footballer)
Hi mate, I quickly categorised Jason Taylor, take a look to see how the categorising of players works as part of WP:AFL. Also include an Rleague link for players who made their debut after 1993. Cheers,  R o  gerthat  Talk  11:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Jebus Christ
Hi Paul,

I was wondering if you'd be interested in signing my petition to have my User:Jebus Christ username reinstated. You mentioned in Talk:Rugby league that you thought the user name blockage was petty. I'm currently campaigning to get it back. I'd be greatfull for your support. The petition is on my talk page: User talk:Jebus Christ

Thanks,

Jimididit 23:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your support. I just discovered that the user who complained about my username has been involved in protecting the mahamad cartoons article from vandalism. I find that somewhat hypocritical. Jimididit 10:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Touch
Sorry Paul but your recent edits at Football are incorrect. See the long and messy discussion at Talk:Touch football (rugby league). What people in Europe usually mean when they refer to "touch rugby" is the code that Australians call Touch or touch football. There are different versions of touch rugby and the Australian-invented Touch is the most popular form worldwide; unlike Australians, Europeans generally refer to both union and league as "rugby". Grant65 | Talk 13:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I understand your frustration, but we need to use terms, and explain things in ways, that cause the least confusion for people in different countries. And the game that we call Touch is called "touch rugby" in Europe and the US. Hence the compromise title for the article: Touch football (rugby league). Grant65 | Talk 13:42, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Ping
Where art thou ? Tintin (talk) 09:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Deletion Proposal
I've added the "prod" template to the article Dulip Samaraweera, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Dulip Samaraweera. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. LeyteWolfer 23:23, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bfirmannqvpr.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bfirmannqvpr.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as or , you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alexj2002 14:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:CatrionaRowntreeGetaway.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CatrionaRowntreeGetaway.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --T-rex 07:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:DawnFrenchVicarofDibley.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:DawnFrenchVicarofDibley.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:JohnHiattSlowTurning.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JohnHiattSlowTurning.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 06:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:HaleAndPaceCat.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HaleAndPaceCat.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  00:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:HaleAndPaceCat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HaleAndPaceCat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  00:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:GryffRhysJonesNTNON.jpg
I have tagged Image:GryffRhysJonesNTNON.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Alpta 22:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

GryffRhysJonesNTNON.jpg
I have tagged Image:GryffRhysJonesNTNON.jpg as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Alpta 22:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GryffRhysJonesNTNON.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:GryffRhysJonesNTNON.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett 02:15, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:3rdumpire.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:3rdumpire.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 193.95.165.190 14:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PamelaStephensonNTNON.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:PamelaStephensonNTNON.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 14:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kytvlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kytvlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:CanberraVNewcastle19032005.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CanberraVNewcastle19032005.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 03:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AdvLanoWoodley.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AdvLanoWoodley.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bfirmannqvpr.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bfirmannqvpr.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Invite to Canberra Meetup #2
--.../Nemo (talk • Contributions) 13:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:MinderCredit.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:MinderCredit.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Football (soccer)
The debate to rename the term football (soccer) to just simply "football" or "association football" has opened again. Please feel free to give your opinion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football_(soccer)_in_Australia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.0.121 (talk) 02:28, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Peter Webb (artist)
I have nominated Peter Webb (artist), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Peter Webb (artist). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 13:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello
 * Paul*! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 23 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Anwar Hossain -
 * 2) Shakeel Ahmed, Jr. -
 * 3) Azmat Rana -
 * 4) Gopal Sharma (cricketer) -
 * 5) Ashok Gandotra -
 * 6) Sadashiv Patil -
 * 7) Jason Taylor (Australian rules footballer) -
 * 8) Gerhardus Liebenberg -
 * 9) Steven Jack -
 * 10) John Commins -


 * 11. Dennis Gamsy
 * 12. Grahame Chevalier
 * 13. Jackie du Preez
 * 14. Richard Dumbrill
 * 15. Tiger Lance
 * 16. Sydney Burke
 * 17. Godfrey Lawrence
 * 18. Harry Bromfield
 * 19. Sid O'Linn
 * 20. Peter Carlstein
 * 21. Jack Nel
 * 22. Brian Taber

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Recent Changes Camp Canberra Aug 11, 2010
I saw you're listed in the ACT Wikipedian page and thought, by chance, you might like to come to this: RecentChangesCamp, Canberra is being held at the University of Canberra, Building 7, Room 7XC37 on 11 August 2010. ABOUT | REGISTRATION | SCHEDULE

Hope we'll see you and friends there, but please register so we can prepare lunch. Leighblackall (talk) 00:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:DS2TheFalls.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DS2TheFalls.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/
 * Paul*|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:52, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:GraemeGardenGoodies.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GraemeGardenGoodies.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/
 * Paul*|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:MarshallRichards05.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MarshallRichards05.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/
 * Paul*|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:56, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

You're invited to the Canberra WikiMeetup on 20 November 2011
Hi! We're having a Canberra Wikimeetup on 20 November 2011 at Siren Bar in Gunghalin from 2pm to 4pm. It's most just a chance to chat with other local Wikipedians, get a chance to go a different sort of bar (which is reasonably kid friendly, serves real food, and has non-alcholic options), and, if you're interested, learning more about what Wikimedia Australia and local GLAM projects are happening. We'd love to see you and any Wikipedia/Wikimedia/wiki loving friends you have there. --LauraHale (talk) 07:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:TISMrage.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TISMrage.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Takes the Australian War Memorial
Hi. You're invited to Wikipedia Takes the Australian War Memorial on 25 August at the Australian War Memorial. --LauraHale (talk) 00:18, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ajit_Pai_(cricketer)
Hello, &#42;Paul*. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ajit_Pai_(cricketer), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Ajit_Pai_(cricketer) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you need help doing so, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,  Itemirus  Message me!  06:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Canberra meetup invitation: January 2013
Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Wednesday 9 January 2013. Yes, that is tomorrow. Sorry about the short notice.

Details an attendee list are at Meetup/Canberra/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:48, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

Canberra meetup invitation: February 2013
Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Sunday 24 February 2013. Sorry about the short notice.

Details and attendee list are at Meetup/Canberra/February 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shadab Kabir


A tag has been placed on Shadab Kabir, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Niket  ★  My Talk Page  ★  12:07, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arvind Apte


The article Arvind Apte has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced Article, No any reliable published sources. Fails WP:V

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. :- Chander  For  You'''  14:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Madhav Apte


The article Madhav Apte has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced Article, No any reliable published sources. Fails WP:V

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. :- Chander  For  You'''  14:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Lauriedaleystatuebruce.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Lauriedaleystatuebruce.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:47, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Brain


The article David Brain has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * blp prod

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:21, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Canberra meetup invitation
Hi, you're invited to the Canberra meetup which will take place at King O'Malley's Irish Pub in Civic on 17 February 2016. Bidgee (talk) 00:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Canberra meetup invitation (August 2016)
I'll be in Canberra from the 29-30 August, there is a planned meet-up at King O'Malley's (though I'm open to suggestions) from 6pm on the 29 August. Sorry for the short noticed, only had the trip confirmed this afternoon. Bidgee (talk) 10:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Canberra meetup
Hi, there will be a meetup in Canberra on the 20 January 2018 at 7pm, I hope you're able to make it but understand that this is very short notice. Bidgee (talk) 12:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Fred le Roux for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fred le Roux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fred le Roux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 13:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Manzoor Elahi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manzoor Elahi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Manzoor Elahi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. SWinxy (talk) 03:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hafizur Rahman


The article Hafizur Rahman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)