User talk:*insert dab*

February 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Reichstag fire, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 49 TL  19:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Reichstag fire. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 19:32, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Reichstag fire, you may be blocked from editing. Aspening (talk) 19:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Reichstag fire. 49 TL  19:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

My vandalism charges
I do not believe this was vandalism, I simply wanted to help the page by making it easier to understand by the public. &#42;insert dab* (talk) 19:41, 20 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:MOS before you go and get yourself blocked. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, I was about the revert you, but I see that Serols beat me to it. You may end up blocked at this point because you continued trying to force your change through, despite the fact that numerous users were reverting you; I think it's a shame that nobody explained properly to you why the existing date format is correct. If you look in the manual of style, specifically MOS:DATE, you'll see the we are explicitly told not to use ordinals - we say 23 March, not 23rd March or 23rd of March. I hope that helps; next time someone reverts you, ask them why they did it, rather than just reinstating your change. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  19:53, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

My supreme data format
It seems that my way of writing the date is so far superior from yours that you are yet to understand it, for this I am truly sorry for your unadvanced way of writing the date and hope that one day you realise I have the far superior way of writing the date. &#42;insert dab* (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * That's great, but if you make further changes in contravention of our WP:MOS now that you've been warned, you'll be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:48, 20 February 2019 (UTC)