User talk:@pple/Archive 3

Ophelia move
Your move of the Ophelia pages was in contrary to the concensus reached on the talk page about a year ago, that the main article should be about the character and link to the disambig page. Please revert it. darkskyz 06:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Reply


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. → lol at your comment PeaceNT 14:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm currently interested in Unicorn, but I'm looking for some material, so haven't edited this page yet. Please join in with me if you like. Best, PeaceNT 14:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * You're right. I'll archive my talk page soon.:-) PeaceNT 15:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Lol...
I'm a boy T_T Shindo9 Hikaru  04:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Category:Defunct organizations and subcats CFD
Hello there, I noticed that you closed the above debate (Categories for discussion/Log/2007 April 13) as Keep, citing WP:USEFUL as justification. I have no objection to your closure, consensus was clearly against change, however you should note that WP:USEFUL is no guide as to when categories should be kept. In fact WP:USEFUL, part of Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, is explicitly flagged up as an argument to avoid in XfD discussions.

At the end of the day, whether one agrees with it or not, WP:USEFUL is simply an essay, not a guideline and certainly not policy. Categorization, Categorization of people, Overcategorization, etc are more valid sources of guidance when coming to a decision on CfD.

Best wishes,  X damr  talk 20:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

-- Hi Appleworm. Categorization mentions 'useful' eight times and Overcategorization mentions 'useful' six times. A Keep close citing useful as used in :Categorization and Overcategorization would seem to meet your needs, not withstanding the position of the essay Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. -- Jreferee 17:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Monobook
I'd like to try using Twinkle, but I'm too lazy to find out about how to add the script to my monobook. May I copy from yours? PeaceNT 13:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, my skin looks different now. =) PeaceNT 13:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I didn't notice that FA. Strange...Aren't FAs supposed to be long? PeaceNT 13:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, that's what I mean, Appleworm-san. PeaceNT 13:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Twinkle works fine, I think I start to like it. PeaceNT 13:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

TeckWiz's RFA
Hey Appleworm. Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RFA this week under my old name, TeckWiz. I'm now known simply as User:R. I hope to keep helping and improving Wikipedia alongside you. -- TeckWiz is now R Parlate Contribs@(Let's go Yankees!) 15:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

User page
I remember you asked me to make a user page for you a little while ago. I'm now much closer to you than before, and I'm interested to try making it for you. Do you still want a user page? Best, PeaceNT 16:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for nice request but I don't feel like having a userpage now. (I'm tired of vandalism)  A  W  16:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That's okay. I understand. Best, PeaceNT 11:13, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

What has happened to the Elvis article?
Some days ago you suggested that the Elvis Presley article needs some rewriting. To my dismay, I have now seen what has happened to the article. User:Northmeister has removed several paragraphs from the article in order to cut it from a very biased point of view. He himself states on his user page, "I've been a lifelong fan of Elvis Presley." Therefore, he removed most material that included some critical remarks concerning the singer's life. The article now reads as if it has been chiefly written by Elvis fans.

There are still expressions in the article that clearly show the dominance of biased fan views:
 * "He remains a pop icon thirty years after his death..."
 * Query: is this really true? In an article entitled "Getting today's teens all shook up over Elvis", Woody Baird says, "Teenagers in the 1950s and '60s went wild over Elvis Presley, much to the consternation of their parents, but kids in the new millennium aren't so stirred by rock 'n' roll's original rebel. 'I can't try to sell somebody Elvis who doesn't know who he is . . . that he's not just some guy who's been gone for 30 years,' said Paul Jankowski, chief of marketing for Elvis Presley Enterprises Inc." Therefore, "the multimillion dollar Elvis business will try to connect with a new generation of teenage fans." They endeavor to show up more film clips, photos and other material from the vast Presley archives online. 'We will take our MySpace page and we will focus on expanding our number of friends on MySpace, that kind of thing,' Jankowski said..." However, Baird concludes, "Moving Elvis content online should be easy; making Elvis cool again will be more difficult. After all, for most kids, Elvis is the music of their parents' - or grandparents' - generation." See


 * "In a musical career of over two decades, Presley set numerous records including, concert attendance, television ratings, and records sales, while became one of the best-selling artists in music history."
 * "His shows in Vegas were known for their highly energetic performances—both vocally and physically—and his trademark jump-suits and capes, which added to the drama. His concert performances were staggering in quantity, numbering 1,145 in the eight years from 1969 to 1977. He continued to perform to sold-out auditoriums around the U.S. until his sudden death in 1977."
 * "By 1957 Presley was the most famous entertainer in the world."

Further changes suggest that fans now dominate the article:
 * A new section entitled "Southern star" has been created.
 * The section concerning the influence of his manager Colonel Tom Parker which was correctly entitled Presley and his manager "Colonel" Tom Parker has been renamed and some critical passages have been removed. For inexplicable reasons, the section is now entitled "American icon".
 * There are now two different sections in the article stressing Elvis being a US mega star: "American idol" and "American icon".
 * On the other hand, more critical paragraphs such as A danger to American culture?, Political beliefs and The Elvis cult and its critics have been deleted.
 * The Death and burial section has been removed.
 * The Elvis lives? section is still in the article.
 * etc. etc.

Several well-sourced details have been totally removed from the older version of the article, for instance:

- from the Early life section:
 * "Vernon Presley is described as "taciturn to the point of sullenness" and as "a weakling, a malingerer, always averse to work and responsibility," whereas his mother, Gladys, was "voluble, lively, full of spunk." Priscilla Presley describes her as "a surreptitious drinker and alcoholic. When she was angry, "she cussed like a sailor." "
 * "Neither Gladys nor Vernon had finished elementary school. The result was one "menial job after another. One run-down apartment after the next, barely enough money to put food on the table for a family of three."
 * The little boy "grew up a loved and precious child. He was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother." "Much has been written about the unusually close relationship between Elvis and his mother, often with the suggestion of something unhealthy afoot," because "Elvis, sole survivor of a pair of twins delivered by Gladys, would reap the love and attention normally given two boys." His mother "worshipped him," said a neighbor, "from the day he was born." Elvis himself said, "My mama never let me out of her sight. I couldn't go down to the creek with the other kids."
 * Interestingly, the following passage is still to be found in the article: "On the evening of April 5, 1936, the Presley's survived the fourth deadliest tornado in US history that took 233 lives."

- from the Death and burial section (which has now been totally removed):
 * On August 16, 1977, at his Graceland mansion in Memphis, Tennessee, Presley was found lying on the floor of his bedroom's bathroom by his fiancee, Ginger Alden, who had been asleep. A stain on the bathroom carpeting was found that indicated "where Elvis had thrown up after being stricken, apparently while seated on the toilet. It looked to the medical investigator as if he had 'stumbled or crawled several feet before he died'."

In the section concerning the influence of Elvis's manager Colonel Parker, which was correctly entitled Presley and his manager "Colonel" Tom Parker but is now wrongly entitled American icon, these well-sourced critical remarks have been removed: The last passage now reads: Significantly, this additional remark has been omitted:
 * Parker's success led to Presley expanding the "Colonel's" management contract to an even 50/50 split. Over the years, much has been written about "Colonel" Parker, most of it critical. "Endlessly deferring to his manager," says John Harris, the singer "watched his own career dive first into B-movie schmaltz and thence towards the dead-end that was Las Vegas." Marty Lacker, a lifelong friend and a member of the Memphis Mafia, says he thought of Parker as a "hustler and scam artist" who abused Presley's reliance on him. Priscilla Presley admits that "Elvis detested the business side of his career. He would sign a contract without even reading it." This would explain the strong influence the Colonel had on Presley. Nonetheless, Lacker acknowledged that Parker was a master promoter.
 * On September 9, 1956, at his first of three appearances on the Sullivan show, Presley drew an estimated 82.5% percent of the television audience, calculated at between 55-60 million viewers. On his third and final appearance (January 6, 1957) on the The Ed Sullivan Show, Sullivan, apparently very impressed by Presley, pointed to him and told the audience "This is a real decent, fine boy. We've never had a pleasanter experience on our show with a big name than we've had with you ... You're thoroughly all right."
 * However, it has also been said that Presley's manager orchestrated the compliment in exchange for permitting Presley to appear, after Sullivan had earlier publicly stated his refusal to allow Presley on his program.

The Drug abuse section is now part of the Controversy surrounding death section, despite the fact that there is no controversy about this abuse of drugs which took place during the singer's lifetime.

References to Elvis's relationships and the Memphis Mafia have been excluded from the text, and the sections on The Elvis cult and its critics and the FBI files on Elvis have been totally removed. This is not acceptable. May I ask you, therefore, to have a closer look at what has happened with this biographical article. Thank you. Onefortyone 23:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 18:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Calling All Creeps.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Calling All Creeps.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi, and about the orphaned image above...
Do you want to switch the image out for the other one? I'm perfectly fine if you want to. Shindo9 Hikaru  01:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Email
haven't seen you around for a week, I hope everything's fine. Are you taking an extended Wikibreak? I've sent you a mail in case you don't check this page too often :-) Miss you, PeaceNT 14:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, me too. I was wondering why you weren't responding to my comment above. Shindo9 Hikaru  03:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back!
Wow - you're back!! I'm so happy to see you again, thanks for the co-nom (you're incredibly fast). I'll send you an email shortly. (Hey! Wait. Have you replied to my last email?:)) Love, PeaceNT 15:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Replied, dear. I was joking above. There's no rush in replying to my email. You've just been back from a break. Just relax and enjoy your time editing. Best, PeaceNT 16:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

:)
Your kind words came to me yesterday as a meaningful and completely unexpected surprise, and today once again I must say I am deeply moved by your sweet email. It's only fair that I give you something in return, dear, for you coming back have made my day brighter. Sorry because this took me some time, but check your mailbox, please. PeaceNT 13:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Apple :) Best wishes, PeaceNT 15:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, Appleworm! Bye bye... ;-) -- Davide21 casella postale 10:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)