User talk:Érico/1

You'll note that I have edited your userpage. This is for your own good; please read this page to understand why. I apologize for the inconvenience. DS (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Frederica Wilson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Bush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Revert on my talk page
Olá Érico,

I noticed your edit to my talk page. I checked both the local and global block logs, and it doesn't appear that this user is currently listed in either. I'm not sure if you can read French, but his comment was not a threat – he was just complaining about admins on pt.wiki. I'm going to revert your revert, okay? I know it probably doesn't feel very good for you to see complaints about your community on a WMF staff talk page, but I feel pretty strongly that editors who aren't blocked should be able to state their opinions onwiki, as long as they're not personally attacking anyone. Thank you for your understanding! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Please be careful...
The edits you recently reverted on Monster Manual were clearly not vandalism. I've been guilty myself of overanxious use of the rollback button, but fellow Wikipedians have often reminded me that many IPs contribute positively to the project. Remember that taking RC-patrol isn't a race and it's often worth it to take an extra second to make sure before hitting that shiny button. Keep up the good work! Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 23:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Title?
Hi, Can you please tell me how YOU came to determine that "one of [my] recent edits, such as the one [I] made to USS Jacana (AMS-193) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive". All of the information that I provided was from true life experience and though it may not seem to be constructive to you, it certainly would be useful for people who, like myself, had an interest in the USS Jacana and her service to the people of the United States of America. You are from Brazil??? What do you know about the history of the United States Navy and the ships that were in service a half century ago. Wikipedia is about information! That is what I was trying to provide before you decided that my information was inconsequential. I guess I won't be making any future financial contributions to an organization that allows such an abusive use of power by an individual who has no clue as to the value of a contribution of ACTUAL HISTORICAL events that occurred fifty years ago.

Thomas J Bembenek, USN Retired. Crewmember of the USS Jacana (AMS/MSC 193) from June of 1960 though September of 1962. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBembenek (talk • contribs) 23:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Pardon me!! I think that you may be a little confused!! I did not remove anything. YOU removed my contribution and in doing so removed the entire contents of the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBembenek (talk • contribs) 23:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

2.121.143.216
That was fast. I skipped over level 2 because he/she had vandalized again even after being reverted, before anyone had warned him/her.— Vchimpanzee  ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 20:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * He/she vandalized the talk page, but that's not serious enough to report the person. I will watch the IP for the next hour.— Vchimpanzee  ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 20:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * This person didn't do anything else. i didn't bother to make a report.— Vchimpanzee  ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 15:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Revert
Hi, you reverted this edit probably assuming it as vandalism and did not give a rationale. I previously removed it with a given explanation both in the editsummary and the talk page. The IPs started warring on it, but the article is semi protected now. I think you should self revert if it was just a procedural vandalism revert vide my rationale. Thanks. -- lTopGunl (talk) 12:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Bem, eu acho que não preciso traduzir para o inglês aqui... Enfim, eu pretendo fazer pequenas edições aqui, mais em relação à alguns ajustes, já que na nossa wikipédia já tem bastante carências, ou seja, muito trabalho por lá. Thanks, Rafael Wiki (talk) 14:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Huh?--Jenny Longlegs (talk) 22:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiThanks
Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.0.210 (talk) 20:26, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello.
My changes are not 'propaganda' as you put it. The sources given on that Turkish newspaper is stated by non-military organizations and is highly false. Pakistan has deployed troops to the Afghan-Indian border, and is currently in war and you expect Turkey to have more troops than Pakistan? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.160.34 (talk) 00:16, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

My RFA
Hi, I just wanted to leave a note saying thank you for partcipating in my RFA, and your comments will be taken on board and acted upon. Hopfully, I will be of a level you can support in a future RFA. Mr Little Irish (talk) © 13:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: June 2012

 * Replied. 67.246.235.218 (talk) 00:35, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Good point. On a less annoying note, I'm an avid fan of the Olympics. I feel glad to see the idea of Rio 2016 starting to take off, and for Brazil to develop further and grow. The world is proud of Brazil. 67.246.235.218 (talk) 00:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Testathon listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Testathon. Since you had some involvement with the Testathon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Martijn Meijering (talk) 20:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for participating in my RFA! I appreciate your support. Zagal e jo^^^ 06:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 17:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined
Hi Érico, I am just letting you know that I declined the A1 speedy deletion of Triumphant, because it seemed to identify subject of the article just fine. Lady of  Shalott  19:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Hello Erico, I just received your message that you've undone some of my page for RiverWinds Community Center. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong, it's my first time contirbuting to Wikipedia and I'm trying to make a page for the community center. If you could please give me some pointers that would be great. Thank you, RiverWinds — Preceding unsigned comment added by RiverWinds Community Center (talk • contribs) 22:27, 30 July 2012 (UTC) Hello Erico, I know where I went wrong, I started editing the wrong page, but what I don't know is where to edit my own page for RiverWinds Community Center. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by RiverWinds Community Center (talk • contribs) 22:52, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

A Brazilian editor?
Hi, Érico. I'm also Brazilian and I'm very glad to learn that you're here too. We are in need of more Brazilians. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 09:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I hope you'll stay around. I'd like to invite you to join the Empire of Brazil task force. Cheers, --Lecen (talk) 12:45, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, you don' have to anything if you don't want you to. It's just a place to people to exchange thoughts, ask for help to review an article, to improve something, etc... --Lecen (talk) 15:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Pedro III of Portugal
I was amazed and outraged once I learned that Qwyrxian closed the move request for Pedro III of Portugal claiming lack of consensus. Twelve editors supported the move and only four opposed. I complained to him about how unfair and absurd was his action and that he should accept the will of the vast majority or at least reopen the move request. I'd like to ask you to share your thoughts about it on his talk page. Thank you, --Lecen (talk) 16:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, this is a mass-produced message which means it may duplicate a message already on your Talk:page. As a result of the lack of reference to specific sources or guidelines such as WP:SOVEREIGN, User:Qwyrxian closed the RM at Talk:Peter III of Portugal but said a new RM could be started if new evidence was presented. This I have done after discussion with Qwyrxian and User:Lecen. This means that . However please note Qwyrxian's request that support/oppose be made with reference to specific arguments guidelines or sources, and (quote) especially recommend that people don't do the "Support per person X and Y", as such comments are close to useless, (unquote). Thanks for your time. Best regards. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Érico, you can't simply say "I agree with Lecen and Joao". There is one big box on the move request that says "As the admin who closed the last discussion as no consensus--I strongly recommend against turning this into another pure vote. I especially recommend that people don't do the "Support per person X and Y", as such comments are close to useless, and are often ignored or at least given lesser importance by closers." The administrator who wrote this and who closed the previous discussion is clearly biased toward the opposing side. It's an unfair discussion. However, you need to be more clear on your vote. Either explain that you support it according to something on Wikipedia's policy or on sources, I don't know. --Lecen (talk) 02:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, then scratch my comment. Érico Wouters  msg 19:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I know what you might be thinking: "Since when every single person that supports or opposes a move requests has to write a Ph.D thesis to approve or oppose something? It's annoying but it's the demand the administrator made. This is why I'm asking you to further elaborate your comment. Thanks a lot, I really appreciate your help. --Lecen (talk) 20:17, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this is annoying ... Érico Wouters  msg 20:28, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Tetum
I'm going to see if there's anybody active who is on that site. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:43, 12 September 2012 (UTC)