User talk:Érico/2015-2019

I don't think that was a test
Concerning this edit, the IP editor put in their summary "Removed supposition. You cannot make unestablished claims without evidence. This is mere propaganda. You must have a reliable third party source of confirmation of such a claim v". Seems more like content dispute. Boomer VialHolla 07:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I also snuck a look at your global contribution history, and I would love to know how to use warning templates on non-English Wikipedia sites. :) Boomer VialHolla 07:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi! I undid this edit because the IP removed sources and content that I considered correct. If you disagree, feel free to undo my edit. About your second question: vary for each wiki. In my home wiki (Portuguese Wikipedia), I use the "Reversão e avisos" script. You can activate it by going to your preferences. In the Wikimedia Commons, you can copy my common.js code. In the Spanish Wikipedia and others, I do manually (see warning templates of eswiki here). Greetings. Érico   (talk)  07:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, ok. I didn't check the actual edit, so I didn't see that the editor removed references. Also, thanks for the links, and information. :) Boomer VialHolla 07:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hi Érico, thanks for your suggestions. I was using the RTRC, it is very useful but not the twinkle... I just added it now. I will try it. Abraços DARIO SEVERI (talk) 14:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
Hello, Érico. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Nomination of Deltopia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deltopia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deltopia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

As someone who has edited the article, I wanted to make you aware of this discussion. Thanks, GauchoDude (talk) 23:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change
 * : Érico   (talk)

to
 * : Érico (talk)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 21:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 10:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

my edit
sorry about that; not my intent Hmains (talk) 04:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No problems! :) Érico   (talk)  23:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice
—— SerialNumber  54129  17:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice
—— SerialNumber  54129  17:16, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Stacey Abrams; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ——  SerialNumber  54129  17:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Do not distort the facts. Who does not respect the status quo of the article is you. Anyway, I will not waste any more time on something so small like this. Well, of course it's sad that English Wikipedia does not allow Stacey Abrams to have a legitimate picture on the infobox... well, at least all other wikis have! ;) Regards, Érico   (talk)  17:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Restoring suspected copyvio infringement
Oh dear, I was rather hoping I wouldn't have to speak to you again, but I feel that I must. As an administrator on Commons, you should know full well that frustrating the application for removal of a suspected copyvio is an absolute no no.

As you are fully aware, I listed for deletion, but instead of AGF and realising that I was a relative newcomer to the deletions process on Commons,  you decided to instead lather yourself in your own pomposity and provide me with a dollop of patronising bullshit by suggesting with this edit that I show "respect [to] ... people with much more experience than [me] here".

Now, this isn't about respect or experience; this is about an image that you uploaded from YouTube that has a questionable copyright.

"The Circus" is a program on Showtime. I visited their YouTube site. The Portal for the programme is here, which is where the image was taken from.

If you take a look at the upper right on both pages, they appear to be selling copies of the programmes. While this looks like it's the official YouTube channel for the show, I see nothing on either page saying they've released anything under a CC license.

Here's their official website. At the bottom of the home page it says "© 2019 Showtime Networks Inc. and Showtime Digital Inc. All rights reserved." Therefore, the program appears to be under copyright as I don't see anywhere where they've given permission to use under a CC license. While YouTube may allow users to mark videos with various CC licenses, there's none on this one.

To make doubly sure, I've also watched the entire 2 minutes + for the clip, and guess what, there's absolutely nothing about a CC licenses there either.

Now, your reason for reverting my nomination was because you say that and that the image(s) were kept. I must ask: Where's the record of that? Only I can't see it. The truth is, there are no Deletion Requests, are there, because otherwise they'd be listed as keep. You must know if there was or if there wasn't, seeing as it was you who. How much investigation did you do to ascertain it's copyright status? Or did you simply assume YouTube = CC?

Finally, It helps to know that you - an admin - and the uploader of the image is also the same person who repeatedly tried to frustrate my attempts to have the image looked at by someone far more knowledgable than me by warring your doubtful version back in place. An admin can't rule on his own uploads, surely, COI?

You even take the trouble to refer to my concerns as "trolling. Not really behaviour I'd expect to see from an administrator.

If you revert this message like you did the one before, like a petulant child, I'll take it elsewhere, but I'd rather keep it local, for now. Hopefully it can be resolved here rather than at a drama board.  Cassianto Talk  17:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I will not discuss any of this here. As I said above, I'm not going to waste any more time on something so insignificant: all other wikis have images of Stacey Abrams... it's not much of an aggregator for enwiki to have any. Finally, apparently you do not know, but it is not in enwiki that the elimination of images of Commons are decided. And I already gave my opinion on the proposal of elimination (here). Regards, Érico   (talk)  17:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Point of order: If you misbehave on the English Wikipedia, it is here that it will be discussed, not Commons. Also note that en-wp image use is governed by en-wp POLICY—not by Commons. Incidenatlly you seem rather involved in that discussion not be seen, frankly, as having a major conflict of interest. Less than surprising. ——  SerialNumber  54129  17:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Come, come, surely you must remember deleting the entire thread on your Commons talk page and accusing me of "trolling"? That, to me, is a sign that I'm not welcome at your Commons talk page (I've lost sleep over more serious things, if I'm honest). In addition to that, Abrams is an enWP article; enWP is where I am frequent. So, as SN states above, to discuss on an enWP talk page an image that is being used on an enWP article seems to be completely normal. Sadly, this is not something I can afford the same description for with regards to your behaviour today.   Cassianto Talk  17:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Ohh, there are several valid images of Stacey Abrams and who is causing "disruption" is me (who is trying to keep a valid image in the infobox). Well, good luck trying to convince yourself about this and rest assured that I will not do anything more about this it here. I only hope you respect the status quo in your future edits and read more about Commons policies. Good saturday! Érico   (talk)  17:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * It's "Saturday".  Cassianto Talk  18:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not being native in English... Como moro no Brasil, falar português é mais importante para mim. Certamente você também tem muito conhecimento em português! ;) Érico   (talk)  18:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to apologise; we all make mistakes. Some of us even admit to making them without feeling the need to hide behind a non-existent language barrier (your English has been impeccable so far).   Cassianto Talk  19:45, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:Érico in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. —— SerialNumber  54129  18:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Emojione1 1F634.svg|45px]]... Érico   (talk)  18:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)