User talk:Ø11

Multiple accounts
Why have you created this account when you already had at least two already: and ? Generally, it is preferred to stick to one account per Sock puppetry. DrKay (talk) 19:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Progression of Montenegro association football caps record


The article Progression of Montenegro association football caps record has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced and disputed as a whole. Removal of all disputed and unsourced material would blank it, thus PROD per WP:BLANK.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

User page/succession history
It looks like you've put a lot of work into the succession history you've been building! You should move it to your sandbox (or if you're ready for others' input, a draft page). Your user page isn't intended to write articles in, and you risk having someone put it up for deletion for not containing the appropriate content. Here's some guidance on what user pages are for: User pages. Thank you and happy editing!  Orville1974  (talk) 20:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maximilian, Duke of Hohenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Bailey ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Maximilian%2C_Duke_of_Hohenberg check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Maximilian%2C_Duke_of_Hohenberg?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, I'm The Mirror Cracked. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sophie Wilmès, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:58, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Princess María de la Esperanza of Bourbon-Two Sicilies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess María de la Esperanza of Bourbon-Two Sicilies, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Princess María de la Esperanza of Bourbon-Two Sicilies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
Your recent editing history at Zonhoven shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -Fastily 20:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)