User talk:Über-Blick

Welcome!
Hello, Über-Blick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:55, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Vladimir Zelenko, you may be blocked from editing. ''I've been looking at your last few edits, and I want to you to consider that this is an encyclopedia, not a forum. Thank you.'' Drmies (talk) 02:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * please keep calm

i work since more than ten years in the german-laguaged-wikipedia and just a few times in the english-laguaged-wikipedia

your reaction on my last edit is very aggressive

i think that could correspondence with the Gender bias on Wikipedia

a bit more friendliness would be good for a better atmosphere

--Über-Blick (talk) 02:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You posted a link to some Facebook picture on an article talk page, a cryptic, nonsensical message that can easily be read as an anti-Muslim comment, and ...well I'm not sure what this is. I don't think that could correspondence with the Gender bias, no. So yes, I think those edits are disruptive, I think those are very strange comments on those talk pages, so yes, I'll point out WP:NOTFORUM. Drmies (talk) 04:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

an Artikel about an emancipatory event wich exists in the german-langued wikipedia ist NOT a cryptic, nonsensical message

it could only be nonsensical for people how are against emancipation

your question I'm not sure what this is

that is the cooperation of authoritarian, terroristic islamistic leaders

your question in this context and your comment in case of the No Hijab Day https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:World_Hijab_Day#No_Hijab_Day is strange and fits to my question of correspondence with the Gender bias on Wikipedia

--Über-Blick (talk) 04:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)