User talk:Ʃx/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, Mstallone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Mystic Krewe of NYX. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Meiloorun  (talk) 🍁 18:27, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Mstallone! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:33, Saturday, December 3, 2016 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Andrew nyr. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Westfield Annapolis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 02:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * thanks for your feedback; however, I believe you made a mistake with your fast edits––I undid vandalism, you undid me, which ultimately added back the original vandalism that I was undoing. Please check my contributions to see my intent. Thanks for your work to maintain Wikipedia, Mstallone (talk) 02:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Aurora. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:43, 19 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message; however, like Andrew nyr, I believe you made a mistake with your fast edits: I undid vandalism, you undid me, which ultimately added back the original vandalism that I was undoing on Aurora. Please check my contributions to see my intent; I even have reported users that you yourself have banned on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Is there a way to prevent these types of wrong warnings in the future? Is it something to do with the way that I revert Vandalism? I am just using Twinkle. Mstallone (talk) 03:49, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Martintype. I wanted to let you know that one of the recent contributions I made to the Wearside Jack page was not incorrect, as per your messages on my Talk Page. Whilst I commend you on your quest to keep vandalism on Wikipedia at bay, I do resent being wrongly accused of adding incorrect information when I am in fact correcting a spelling mistake. I've created a new Wearside Jack Talk Section with numerous references to back this up, and would welcome your contribution. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Martintype (talk) 21:59, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi, Martintype! Thank you for your feedback and your contributions to Talk:Wearside Jack with the additional sources! The reverts I had made were based on the spelling from the reference source for that specific claim in the article (citation #20 as it stands currently). A lot of unconstructive edits I see here on Wikipedia introduce incorrect spellings, and I hope you can understand that, without a source correcting the original source, it is easy to assume that your original edits were merely unconstructive edits. In the future, I would highly recommend sourcing additions with the original edits so that Wikipedia users like myself do not assume its vandalism. Again, many thanks for correcting me and updating the article's talk page! Mstallone (talk) 03:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Kinnythuytrang

 * Hey, this is not vandalism and this information was added in from a famous serial killer who "claimed" to be her "best friend" and "bridesmaid" for her "wedding". She had never met this woman before, so I don't know why I forgot to add the source to her picture, thanks Kinnykellylaifattsfosters (talk) 02:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)