User talk:Ȝeſtikl/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, Ȝeſtikl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Americium did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. ComplexRational (talk) 20:13, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know! So, how do I "refer to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media."  What counts as reliable?Ȝeſtikl (talk) 20:29, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * In general, a source is considered reliable when it is published after being refereed or fact-checked. Usually, reference books and scientific journal articles, as well as certain websites whose credibiliy can be verified, are considered reliable; WP:SOURCE gives a more comprehensive overview of what is generally accepted. As such, it so happens that many of the sources cited in the americium article fit into one of these categories.
 * When citing a source, you must be careful to ensure two things: the writing must be your own to avoid plagiarism, and whatever is written must directly reflect what is in the source, whether it is a fact or clear implication (of the authors). In other words, you must cite the facts and only the facts; drawing new conclusions from sources is considered original research and is not accepted here. Also, it is not necessary to directly quote source content; paraphrasing is the best way to go as long as it does not resemble the source too closely.
 * Finally, to cite a source in an article, &#60;ref&#62;&#60;/ref&#62; tags are used in the source editor (I’m not familiar with the visual editor) along with a citation template; the specifics of how to cite are covered in detail on the individual pages and in this guide.
 * I hope this answers your question. Happy editing! ComplexRational (talk) 20:49, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Nanfeng County
Hello! Your submission of Nanfeng County at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ComplexRational (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Jiankang Subdistrict moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jiankang Subdistrict, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Geolodus (talk) 18:11, 3 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Ok. I created it because there was a disambig that pointed to it.  Should I get rid of the disambig link? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ȝeſtikl (talk • contribs) 20:04, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Probably, until a referenced article on the subject exists. Geolodus (talk) 17:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

"Lantsong" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lantsong. Since you had some involvement with the Lantsong redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 11:45, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Recent edit to Caprock, New Mexico
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Shaun 03:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, Shaun. I went through WP:NOT but I didn’t find what I did wrong with adding a zip code. Could you please clarify? Thank you. Ȝeſtikl (talk) 10:56, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Rollback granted
{{safesubst:require subst|template=Rollback granted 3|1= Hi Ȝeſtikl. After reviewing your request for "{{mono|rollbacker}}", I have&#32;temporarily [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A%C8%9Ce%C5%BFtikl enabled] rollback on your accountfor three months. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: —Tom Morris (talk) 18:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Draft:Zhang Dinghuang
Thanks for cleaning this up--are you going to continue with rest of the draft, or else I will deal with it. but you're much more qualified.  DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have been planning to, but didn’t have much time recently. Any help is appreciated. :) Ȝeſtikl ( t  c   e ) 10:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Yuzhang Subdistrict moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Yuzhang Subdistrict, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:51, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Jiankang Subdistrict concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jiankang Subdistrict, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jiankang Subdistrict


Hello, Ȝeſtikl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jiankang Subdistrict".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 11:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict


Hello, Ȝeſtikl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuzhang Subdistrict".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Similar to Township Units of China


Hello, Ȝeſtikl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Similar to Township Units of China".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict
Hello, Ȝeſtikl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict


Hello, Ȝeſtikl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuzhang Subdistrict".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)