User talk:Ε( 'Θ' )϶

Please don't change my edits to joan of arc. Look it up, she was a cross-dresser. And she was burned by the french

September 2014
Hello, I'm Jeffrd10. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Limerick&diff=624299333&oldid=624198739 this edit] to Limerick, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jeffrd10 (talk) 15:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jeffrd10. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Limerick&diff=624299587&oldid=624299398 this edit] to Limerick, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jeffrd10 (talk) 15:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ring of Kerry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. - Camyoung54   talk  01:47, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Joan of Arc because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 14:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joan of Arc. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Joan of Arc was changed by Ε( 'Θ' )϶ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930025 on 2015-02-06T14:27:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Joan of Arc. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Favonian (talk) 09:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.