User talk:Συντάκτης

What this user edits
This user edits these pages:

✅Technology articles. All articles in technology.

✅Automotive articles All automotive articles including emergency vehicle articles, automotive lighting articles, and other vehicle equipment articles.

✅This user will also edit many other articles.

✅User talk pages

✅Talk pages


 * I have removed your false claim above that you block IPs and users that do bad editing. If you hope to ever have that privilege, you would do well to avoid making such claims. Also, please remove your statement above that you clear the sandbox; clearing the sandbox is not your job; it is done by a bot. teb728 t c 07:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

I understand and I have removed that claim. Συντάκτης (talk) 02:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

BAMM
You have new messages (last change).

April 2015
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Συντάκτης. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. ''Your edit summary in Special:Diff/655139243 was a personal attack. In addition, please do not re-add the administrator topicon. Thanks.'' --L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) 04:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Sandbox
Hi. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, it is not your job to patrol the sandbox and decide what is and isn't constructive. The sandbox is cleared regularly by bots, and the headers are automatically replaced. Warning users for unconstructive editing in the sandbox is actually unconstructive on your end, because this is precisely what the sandbox is for - testing and potentially unconstructive edits. Please leave people alone to do their editing tests there instead of reverting them every so often. This was unwarranted - people paste articles into the sandbox to work with them without messing up the real article. If you wish to make sandbox edits, you can do it in your own sandbox where you can revert anyone you want. Warning users for unconstructive editing is better left to a more experienced user - i.e. someone with over 200 mainspace edits. Finally, please refrain from masquerading an administrator or making personal attacks; you could get blocked from editing. Thank you, &mdash; kikichugirl  oh hello! 06:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Agree with above... I already wanted you about this on my talk page. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 13:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi.
I have a question... Are you indeed using multiple accounts? If so, can you please list off any alternative accounts you may own? I'm asking because there's something unusual about the block notice above. I don't see any evidence you are socking. And if you are indeed a sock puppet, your original account isn't named, so... Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 00:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Heads up; You are allowed to edit this page unless an administrator decides to revoke that privilege. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 00:49, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Just to let you know, you aren't quite blocked for the admin icon/person attack... You're blocked because an administrator thinks you are a sock puppet. However, me and another user are also questioning your block at this talk page section. Feel free to check it out. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 02:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Note from blocking admin: Συντάκτης, you (the person, not this account) were blocked at the time that this account was created, so you will likely need to address the block evasion before any unblock will be considered here. For privacy reasons, you are not required to discuss the prior block publicly here, so you may want to take advantage of the Unblock Ticket Request System where a limited number of admins will have access to your appeal, and where an uninvolved CheckUser can double check my results. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 03:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)