User talk:Σ/Archive/2013/July

Please comment on Talk:2002 Gujarat violence
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2002 Gujarat violence. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 02:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter
We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to  for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, and  being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

I did not understand what the Speedy Deletion tag was. I apologize for removing it.

Please comment on Talk:Rahul Gandhi
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rahul Gandhi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

about the deletion of my edited page
Could you spare me a few minutes? I find the page I edited was deleted by you, so I just want to know if I rewrite the page according to your requirements,will it be published and not be deleted again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lanalei123 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Surfer43. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Garnetta, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Surfer43 (talk) 03:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Surfer43. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, QuadLabs Technologies, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Surfer43 (talk) 06:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

A Knighthood for you!

 * Thanks. → Σ σ  ς . (Sigma) 19:11, 20 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Sigma. Please review User talk:Retrolord and Declining a British honour. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:43, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Interesting. → Σ σ  ς . (Sigma) 00:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Not sure how to interpret above. Decides to say nothing. Realises its too late as I've already pressed save page. Damn.  ★ ★King•Retrolord★ ★  15:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Username 666
The only reason I did the encyclopedia entry so quickly is because I don't have a lot of information on Username 666. Thank you

NathanArt — Preceding unsigned comment added by NathanArt (talk • contribs) 16:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

MAMA
WHY DO YOU KEEP VOTING TO DELETE MY PAGES I MEAN WTF!? I'M A CREEPY PASTA WRITER NOT SOME GUY WITH A HUGE BRAIN!!!!!!! SO STOP THIS MADNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 thank you

Nathan Art — Preceding unsigned comment added by NathanArt (talk • contribs) 17:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Steven Crowder
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Steven Crowder. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:15, 25 July 2013 (UTC)