User talk:Σ/Archive/2022/February

Editor summary search for srwiki
Hello! First of all, I would like to thank you for this amazing tool. I tried it with sr.wiki database, but it shows the following errors: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/aiomysql/connection.py", line 503, in _connect await self._request_authentication File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/aiomysql/connection.py", line 785, in _request_authentication auth_packet = await self._read_packet File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/aiomysql/connection.py", line 593, in _read_packet packet.check_error File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pymysql/protocol.py", line 220, in check_error err.raise_mysql_exception(self._data) File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pymysql/err.py", line 109, in raise_mysql_exception raise errorclass(errno, errval) pymysql.err.InternalError: (1049, "Unknown database 'srwiki_p'")

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last): File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/src/app.py", line 33, in inner return func(*a, **kw) File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/src/app.py", line 98, in summary_py tpl, store = Summary(params) File "./summary.py", line 26, in __call__ loop.run_until_complete(self.do_query(store.server, store.query)) File "/usr/lib/python3.7/asyncio/base_events.py", line 584, in run_until_complete return future.result File "./summary.py", line 142, in do_query async with sql.connect(**connect_info(server)) as conn1: File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/aiomysql/utils.py", line 48, in __aenter__ self._obj = await self._coro File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/aiomysql/connection.py", line 75, in _connect await conn._connect File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/aiomysql/connection.py", line 523, in _connect self._host) from e pymysql.err.OperationalError: (2003, "Can't connect to MySQL server on 'srwiki.labsdb'") Could you please check this? --Aca (talk) 06:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Not very informative message
See the edit comment is

Archive failure: ceterach.exceptions.EditError: 'spamblacklist': CeterachError('Your edit was not saved because it contains a new external link to a site registered on Wikipedia\'s blacklist or Wikimedia\'s global blacklist. * \'\'\'To save your changes now\'\'\', you must go back and \'\'remove the blocked link\'\' (shown below), and then save. **Note that if you used a redirection link or URL shortener (like e.g. \'\'\'goo...

which is just that little bit informative, it didn't give the section being archived or the link being objected to. And the section was a large one! I found it by pastingit into a section on a user page so easy enoughbut might catch someone else. Just putting the important things first would fix this. Thanks. NadVolum (talk) 12:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

mb Talk:The Mekons‎ 02:08 −6,665‎ ‎Lowercase sigmabot III talk contribs‎ (Archiving 6 discussion(s) to Talk:The Mekons/Archive 1) (bot)
Why? What was the harm in leaving it up? I wish that you had not done that. At leaset one mentioned issue is still unresolved. Acwilson9 (talk) 18:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Presumably you refer to . Lowercase sigmabot III has no way of knowing whether a thread is "unresolved" or not, it checks the most recent timestamp in the thread. The six threads that were archived were last posted to on the following dates:
 * Mekons.de - 08:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The photograph - 16:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Pop culture references - 08:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * "Mekons 77", "Mini-Mekons", "Freakons", etc. - 21:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * "The Mekons" vs mekons - 08:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Tributes to the Mekons? - 03:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * all of which were more than a year ago. The bot was operating entirely within the constraints of the archiving setup, see also my reply at Talk:The Mekons. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 00:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Persistent archiving for an unclear reason
What's the reason for persistent archiving a section that is one month old and hasn't been discussed yet? On the talk page there is a section that is almost one year old and is not archived, as far as I can tell. – Fobemipa (talk) 15:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , the talk page is configured to archive discussions older than 30 days with no activity. The older section lacked a section heading so would not archive properly. I've responded to the open question and given the older section a heading. Schazjmd   (talk)  15:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. — Fobemipa (talk) 16:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)