User talk:ΦΓ

May 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Phil Kerpen. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stwalkerster talk review 12:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Sorry, I made a mistake with this. Please see my talk page for more info. Stwalkerster talk review 17:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Erik Telford


The article Erik Telford has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No significant secondary sources to show notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Will Beback   talk    00:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Erik Telford listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Erik Telford. Since you had some involvement with the Erik Telford redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Hugh (talk) 21:41, 19 May 2015 (UTC)