User talk:Доктор наука

Speedy deletion nomination of Tesla Pipeline


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Tesla Pipeline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 19:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I added a sentence about the pipeline and removed the deletion tag. It would be great if you could add more content to this article! CapitalSasha ~ talk 21:29, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your article Кавитација
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Кавитација to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. { MordeKyle }  &#9762;  21:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

February 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ivo Andrić; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 22:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

July 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Ktrimi991 (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop being a blind bureaucrat and advocate of the status quo, you're the reason Wikipedia is dying of. This is blatant propaganda here, same as if I wrote that Edi Rama is a Serb and quoted some dubious sources. You're setting up things completely wrong here, now I need to waste hours to prove that this notorious propaganda is propaganda, but will do nonetheless Доктор наука (talk) 16:26, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You need to back your edits with reliable academic sources. Read WP:RS. Take a look at WP:Civility too. Ktrimi991 (talk) 16:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tesla pipeline for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tesla pipeline is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tesla pipeline until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)