User talk:Илья Драконов/Archive 2

January 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Crimea Railway. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ron h jones (Talk) 21:51, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Ronhjones, but I did not revert more than 3 times! Ilya Drakonov (talk) 06:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC).
 * I reverted only 2 times: 1, 2. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 07:00, 6 January 2016 (UTC).
 * You are blocked for edit warring, not for a breach of the three-revert rule, and three reverts is not an entitlement. As it says at WP:EW, "The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly, but it is not a definition of what "edit warring" means, and it is perfectly possible to edit war without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so." As it happens, I can actually count three reverts anyway - this, this, and this. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:31, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, as there appear to have been vandal attacks at this page, I have protected it to prevent IP editors from editing it for the duration of the block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I just wanted to write 3 new articles... Ilya Drakonov (talk) 09:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC).

Fake and POV about railways in Crimea
Hi,

I have noticed that you have added fake information that railway lines to Crimea were demolished but I could not find any sources of this information. This information seems to be simply fake, please do not put it back unless you find a reliable source for that. In addition, adding the fact that stations are owned by Crimea Railway violates NPOV as ownership is disputed and is a subject of a lawsuit. I have fixed these problems in the article about Armyansk railway station, please take this into account while writing about other railway stations in Crimea and make appropriate changes in other articles about railway stations in Crimea you have written. Thanks — NickK (talk) 16:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, I see. If you need to change something, feel free to do so. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 11:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC).

Thank you for supporting my RfA

 * You are welcome:) It's a pity, that your request did not succeed. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 10:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of Adyghe Wikipedia


The article Adyghe Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable; notability is not inherited

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Graham (talk) 01:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Should I make the article longer? Ilya Drakonov (talk) 05:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC).
 * I'm not sure that that will necessarily solve the issue regarding notability. The English Wikipedia's notability guidelines for websites say the following:
 * While I'm not very familiar with the Adyghe Wikipedia, I don't know it to have that level of significance and I would be surprised if it were to have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. If in expanding the article, you were to prove that the Adyghe Wikipedia meets the standard provided by the notability guidelines, that would certainly satisfy my concerns. But unless its notability is proven, simply lengthening the article for its own sake will not help. Graham (talk) 06:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, I see. I just thought that if there are articles about other Wikis, maybe there can be one about Ady.wiki. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 07:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC).
 * Well, I see. I just thought that if there are articles about other Wikis, maybe there can be one about Ady.wiki. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 07:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC).

Nomination of Adyghe Wikipedia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adyghe Wikipedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adyghe Wikipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Graham (talk) 04:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Rusyn or Ukrainian
Hello. I don't speak any Slavic languages, so I was wondering whether and  are written in Rusyn or Ukrainian. Thank you for your time. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 16:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi. It's old stile Russian language, used before the reform in 1918. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 08:40, 11 January 2017 (UTC).

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Atomenergoexport, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

PRehse (talk) 18:54, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, okay. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 18:59, 17 December 2017 (UTC).

Nomination for deletion of Template:Abkhazian Railway
Template:Abkhazian Railway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians in Krasnodar


A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians in Krasnodar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)