User talk:Лобачев Владимир/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Speedy deletion nomination of Two monkeys (Theatre)
Hello Лобачев Владимир,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Two monkeys (Theatre) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LS1979 (talk) 09:38, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Lithuania
I know that Ruthenian was a major language of the Grand Duchy. But to question that Lithuanian even played a role as a language of the GD?..... That would need to be sourced. I have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to OR. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 18:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Lithuanian language was the official language of the principality? There are sources? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not about official languages. Those were not around at the time. It's about languages. Sources for obvious things are not necessary WP:OBVIOUS. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 19:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Lithuanian was never a state language in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It was a language of Lithuania however. Did you read what I said above? What is your point? Please explain.Gerard von Hebel (talk)!
 * It says "common languages". Do you understand what that means? It doesn't show from the above conversation. It doesn't mean what you say. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 20:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you seriously saying that we need a fact tag to say in the article that Lithuanian was one of the "common languages" of that polity? Gerard von Hebel (talk) 21:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

This is nonsense. I made it in to an wp:rfc. See the talk page of the article Talk:Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 21:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The text there is now: Should there really be a fact tag, asking for a source whether Lithuanian was a common language in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania? This was added by user:Лобачев Владимир. For me I think this is a misunderstood consequence of a Litvinist edition by an editor who may not understand the difference between an official language or a language actually used in a Medieval polity. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 23:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

GDL
Discuss in Talk:Grand Duchy of Lithuania and don't just blindly revert everything! – Sabbatino (talk) 16:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Пяденица малая бледная, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idaea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Report this page. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your article Пяденица малая бледная
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Пяденица малая бледная to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. &mdash;  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 12:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Christmastide Slavs has been nominated for discussion
Category:Christmastide Slavs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Easter of Slavs has been nominated for discussion
Category:Easter of Slavs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Busójárás into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. /wiae /tlk  10:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Carnival into Slavic carnival. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm MarkSewath. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Transnistria have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MarkSewath (talk) 08:11, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Anthem of the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic
Hi there,

I was just wondering why you undid my revision of the Anthem of the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic. As far as I can tell, I was streamlining the article and editing out some irrelevant information. If you could provide a reasonable explanation, I would happily accept it.

Thanks. -205.154.44.96 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.154.44.96 (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your edit to "Roman calendar"
In your edit today to "Roman calendar" part of the caption to the figure you added was indecipherable: "(III - IV c. C.E.)". Perhaps this has something to do with a date. If so, you should write it in accord with MOS:DATEFORMAT. Jc3s5h (talk) 14:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Boginki vs. Boginka
Hello My understanding is that Boginki is the plural form of Boginka. Is that incorrect?
 * That's correct. Article Boginka – WP:FRINGE. See Talk:Boginka. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 12:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * So then we have two articles about the same topic. Per Content forking we should have only one article per topic. Vexations (talk) 12:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Ok. New article Boginka – fringe theories. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 12:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please obtain real consensus before reverting other users redirects in Slavic mythology articles. From the edit histories it appears that your are going AGAINST consensus.'' Polyamorph (talk) 12:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Thanks for the sources that you are providing, but it would be better if you put them into the articles and rewrite them
I thank you for all the sources that you are providing in articles' talk pages. However, the sources should be put in the articles and used to support the content of the articles. So, why don't you start using these sources to rewrite horrible articles like Supernatural beings in Slavic religion (whose title should be changed as well, since these beings do not seem "supernatural" at all, since they are innatural... "Slavic nature spirits" would go better), Rusalka, etc.?--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 13:02, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the offer, but I do not know English well. Therefore, I write mostly in Russian. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 14:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Russian literary fairy tales
Category:Russian literary fairy tales has been nominated for merging with Category:Russian fairy tales. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Place Clichy (talk) 16:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Category:Slavic countries and territories
Category:Slavic countries and territories, to which you have contributed, is being proposed for deletion. As an editor interested in Slavic topics, your view on the situation could be helpful. The discussion is located at Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 8. Krakkos (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Russian folk fairy tale has been nominated for discussion
Category:Russian folk fairy tale has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 12:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

ru:Крымская народная республика
Поняли. ВотанБатан (talk) 17:13, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Если вопрос о статье в руВики, то лучше его обсуждать на СО этой статьи (в руВики). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:11, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

не могу ВотанБатан (talk) 00:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian folk games


A tag has been placed on Category:Russian folk games requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 16:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:Characters of the Slavic Cabinet Mythology has been nominated for deletion
Category:Characters of the Slavic Cabinet Mythology has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MClay1 (talk) 12:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Moldavia
Your recent editing history at Moldavia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (Rgvis (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2021 (UTC))