User talk:НазариНазар

November 2018
Hello, I'm Seraphim System. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Amatuni. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Seraphim System ( talk ) 20:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Seraphim System. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Amatuni, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please make sure you've read and understood our sourcing policies before continuing to make significant additions to articles. If you have any questions you can ask me or one of the volunteers at WP:TEAHOUSE. ''  Seraphim System  ( talk ) 20:29, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Amatuni shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Seraphim System ( talk ) 20:36, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Seraphim System ( talk ) 21:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello НазариНазар. Please see the report about your edit warring. If you don't promise to stop and wait for consensus, you are likely to be blocked per the usual WP:3RR enforcement rules. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

It is that User:Seraphim system started a war of edits on this article by removing credible historical scientific information with references, citations and also User:Seraphim system was removing bibliography.НазариНазар (talk) 18:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring at Amatuni
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Warring to add poorly-sourced material to articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:40, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Excuse me mister,why are you lying about this issue and covering up for user:"seraphim" system,while he is not a seraphim,but he is the wiki-lusifer. And you are laying again mister, when youwere blocking User:Ha3ap with this false reasons:"for Warring to add poorly-sourced material to articles", and then deleting most credible information.

There was many excellent citations with references and sources. This is a pure froad from your side mister, when you deleted references of Movses Horenatci,Nicolas Adontz, K.Tumanoff,S. Eremyan and many other armenian and non-armenian historians who wrote about Armenian princes Amatuni.

Also,you deleted medieval document(Zoranamak) about all Armenian naxararas and they military might. This is a Shame. And it is also looks like hidden(well,not so hidden after all) discrimination against family of Amatuni with attempt to diminish their role in the kingdom of Greater Armenia and their later heroical defense of castle Maku(Shavarshan) against Tamerlan himself(!), which was written by medieval diplot Ruy de Clavijo. Shame on you people! You are really so, so far from History,unless you conspired deliberately to destroy full information about the history of the nobel house of Amatuni.

What is you deal, ah?, when you deleting information about Oshakan and about Amatuni being in charge of tax service of the Armenian kingdom and also about they military contribution of 500 cavalrymen during the wars.This all well-known facts from many books(which you guys didn't read).

What is your problem man, when you are removed information from the same sources you are accepted before, about Amatuni descent from Astiages which written by K.Tumanoff,suggestion of N.Adontz and early tradition of Horenatci?

Because you people do not read books, few times you delete additional info from the same books and authors,which already been accepted here. You are blocking user:Ha3ap, because he brings more of the great interesting information about this family with citation. It is a really BIG question, what are you people doing here and why!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.242.117.4 (talk) 08:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 2
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Seraphim System ( talk ) 20:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * See the new complaint at WP:AN3. I've proposed that you be indefinitely blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:44, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mz7 (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)