User talk:Српска Крајина

You purposely create a section named "controversy" even though it belongs under ICTY custody and put it up top so everyone sees your bs, you purposely avoid adding crucial parts of the story, and now you go as far as bolding the part you deem important. You avoided discussion in the Serbophobia talk page and simply put its a "grass root argument", and then you give me a warning. PRODUCER (talk) 16:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This is coming from the POV pusher who's edits are purposely misleading by giving half the story and bolding the parts that they think is important. Please stop with the hypocrisy, your edits are based on your opinion. You completely failed to use the talk page on the Serbophobia article, and idiotically give me a warning. I didnt make up WP:NOR, WP:NPOV and WP:PUSH. PRODUCER (talk) 13:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

The flag itself does not play an important role especially considering that the President has his own flag. And the portrait image is used because it has a much higher resolution and per Wiki image guidelines higher quality images should be used instead of the lower quality images and it is an official portrait and if you check some other articles like that one on American presidents you will notice that they use official high resolution portraits as well.--Avala (talk) 12:04, 23 February 2009 (UTC)