User talk:Яненавижутебя

Ты не любишь меня, я  ненавижу тебя  не  играть с тобой.

Disambiguation link notification for July 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Moral World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/New_Moral_World check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/New_Moral_World?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Banana Pictures
Hello Яненавижутебя,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Banana Pictures for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Onel 5969  TT me 11:54, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Axcess News, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Nelson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

REPCITE
Hello. Have you read WP:REFBOMB? The article 11ic has this problem. --- Possibly (talk) 08:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 11ic


A tag has been placed on 11ic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. --- Possibly (talk) 08:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Nutuge.com moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Nutuge.com, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:26, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 360 Military Web


The article 360 Military Web has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Can't find any in-depth coverage. Currently, all 8 sources are simple listings."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Constitutional Forum
Hello, Яненавижутебя,

Thank you for creating Constitutional Forum.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"The first link will not translate. A key issue here is to have content about xianzheng.net than about Chinese intellectuals and China blocking websites. So, more references about xianzheng.net are needed. Thank you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 20:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 11ic


A tag has been placed on 11ic, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GermanKity (talk) 09:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of 11ic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 11ic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/11ic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GermanKity (talk) 15:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

"The Baltimore Post-Examiner" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Baltimore Post-Examiner. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  08:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Please disregard - my bad. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  08:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)