User talk:Սարգիս Մելքոնյան

August 2022
Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hey @MrOllie, thanks for the message. Renderforest is the biggest platform for audio visualizations and it is the most popular as it ranks under that keyword. I see there are other smaller platforms mentioned, that's why I added Renderforest there. I appreciate your advice, I'll create an article on Wikipedia about Renderforest, but for now, I ask you to turn back it, thanks man Սարգիս Մելքոնյան (talk) 12:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * It sounds like you're being paid for SEO. Keep in mind that there are mandatory disclosure requirements for that, which you can find at WP:PAID. Also keep in mind that external links from Wikipedia will not help with your SEO, as all outgoing links here have the 'nofollow' attribute applied. MrOllie (talk) 13:16, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * What you said doesn't have any relation with reality. It's one of my favorite platforms and I found that it completely fits with the article. I know that external links from Wikipedia are not helping in SEO, and the links have the "no follow" attribute applied. However, it isn't fair from your side to let there be Goom or Gforce and not allow Renderforest to be there. From my side, it seems like you are only letting the information you want to be there. Thanks! Սարգիս Մելքոնյան (talk) 15:12, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * From my side, I'm keeping out external links that violate Wikipedia's content policies. MrOllie (talk) 15:50, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renderforest (January 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Renderforest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Renderforest Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Renderforest reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello Սարգիս Մելքոնյան. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Renderforest, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Սարգիս Մելքոնյան. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Dear DoubleGrazing,
 * Thank you for your message and concerns. I would like to clarify that I am not receiving any compensation, directly or indirectly, for my edits related to Draft:Renderforest. My contributions are made in good faith to enhance the quality of content on Wikipedia. I'm committed to upholding Wikipedia's policies and appreciate your diligence. I also would like to ask your help to make this article better.
 * Thank you Սարգիս Մելքոնյան (talk) 12:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Really? So you're not the person shown on LinkedIn has having a marketing role at Renderforest? Sure about that now? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I work at Renderforest and this is my linkedin profile https://www.linkedin.com/in/sargismelkonyan/ but again, I'm not getting compensation directly or indirectly for this edit. Սարգիս Մելքոնյան (talk) 13:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:PAID, which clearly states that employees are covered by the paid-editing rules regardless of whether they are being paid specifically or explicitly for editing Wikipedia. This is a hard requirement, and completely non-negotiable. Please make the necessary disclosure as your very next edit. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:21, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I haven't knew this before, I will surely review this statement and ensure compliance with the disclosure requirements in my next edit. Սարգիս Մելքոնյան (talk) 13:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Renderforest has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Renderforest. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your support. I will review the article by considering your comments. Սարգիս Մելքոնյան (talk) 12:47, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Renderforest


Hello, Սարգիս Մելքոնյան. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Renderforest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  14:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)