User talk:כאיסר

Warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Stop
Alright. Let me put it this way. You're violating WP:3RR pretty hardcore on the Language of Jesus page. That means you will get blocked the very next time you make a revert on that page. Its not even just the fact that you're edit-warring; you also blatantly removed reliable sources based on your own interpretation. That's a violation of WP:VANDALISM to round out a solid WP:TENDENTIOUS case. I'd therefore like to advise you to 1) stop reverting ASAP. 2) present your concerns on the talk page of the article (by opening a "new section") and show reliable sources that back up your claims. Bests and thanks - LouisAragon (talk) 00:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 00:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Language of Jesus. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: You have now been blocked twice in a very short period of time for essentially the same behavior. That's not a good sign. Add to that that I'm not seeing any constructive editing in your history and I'd say you are in the express lane heading for the exit marked "Indefinite Block." I suggest you take the next few days to think carefully about what it is that you want to do here and whether or not that involves constructive editing. As it stands, your next block, if one is required, will almost certainly be your last. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)