User talk:רדיומן

Dirar Abu Seesi
I removed sections where "Implication" and "Speculation" is used and not backed up in the sources. Can't use that on Wikipedia. It has to be backed up by sources. Using "Implication" implies original research to connect point A to point B. Need hard evidence to connect. Couple of suggestions. I would make sure every paragraph has a reference. For Good Aricle or Featured Aticle status, every paragraph needs atleast one reference, even if it is the same reference as the previous paragraph. It would be helpful in articles as contentious as Israeli/Palestinian topics. Other suggestion is that Haaretz has an English version. Would be better if the articles can be found in English... It is the English version of Wikipedia. Otherwise, the article looks fine, but I will dig a little deeper tomorrow. I do believe the article should be on Wikipedia. So, I'm not trying to get rid of it, just making sure only the known facts are reported.

I do some "janitor" work on articles... sometimes 500 articles a day. I have to skim each one. It has gotten very scary to see all the people taken into some government custody and never to be heard from again. Bgwhite (talk) 06:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Tikun Olam (blog)
Please do not refer to other editors' good-faith edits as vandalism. In fact, you probably should read WP:Vandalism, especially "What is not vandalism". — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:COI
Richard, editing an article about your own blog is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. Please read WP:SELFPROMOTION. Kigelim (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Avera Mengistu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avera Mengistu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Avera Mengistu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kigelim (talk • contribs) 20:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry investigation
Accusations have been made that you are a sockpuppet of, as outlined at Sockpuppet investigations/Richards1052. I find the evidence quite convincing. I would like to hear what you have to say about these accusations. If you are indeed using both accounts, you will be required to abandon one of them, and stick to a single account in the future. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not Silverstein - He's in Seattle and I'm in Israel. A checking of his IP & mine can prove this. רדיומן (talk) 05:02, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm Shrike. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please do not refer to other editors' good-faith edits as vandalism. In fact, you probably should read WP:Vandalism, especially "What is not vandalism"'' Shrike (talk) 08:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

WP:ARBPIA3
You will already notified about ARBPIA articles please don't edit those articles until you reach 500 edits--Shrike (talk) 13:29, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Silverstein blog

 * It is exceedingly unlikely that you should happened to immediately jump onto this particular bandwagon.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Warning
Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.Deb (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)