User talk:שי אביגד

Hi! I am Shay Avigad, and feel free to message me about anything you want from me.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jaime Pressly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kinston High School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Keeping Up with You concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Keeping Up with You, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cathleen Summers


The article Cathleen Summers has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 05:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:A Nightmare on Elm Street (film series) has been nominated for discussion
Category:A Nightmare on Elm Street (film series), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 13:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Non-diffusing categories
Hello. I saw you removed categories from several film articles. Some of them are non-diffusing, which means that they should not be removed, even when articles are already in subcategories. These include categories like and. All relevant films should put in these categories. I know it's unintuitive, but if you see a category repeatedly included in a large number of well-developed articles, it never hurts to check the category to see if it's non-diffusing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:13, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Star Wars categories
You have removed many film categories which should stay per WikiProject Film/Categorization. And WP:EPONYMOUS says:
 * Articles with an eponymous category may be categorized in the broader categories that would be present if there were no eponymous category (e.g. the article France appears in both Category:France and Category:Western Europe, even though the latter category is the parent of the former category). Editors should decide by consensus which solution makes most sense for a category tree.
 * You need consensus to remove Star Wars films from Category:Star Wars films. Marking category removals as minor edits is against Help:Minor edit. PrimeHunter (talk) 19:32, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I have reverted a series of your recategorisations as I don't consider them to be appropriate. If you wish to discuss the categorisation scheme of films such as the Star Wars saga films, you are welcome to bring it up at Talk:Star Wars. Also, please do not add the films to absurd categories like Category:Amputees in fiction. This is not a defining feature of any of the films and should not be used in these cases. Thanks for your understanding. Cnbrb (talk) 13:02, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Star Wars (film), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please stop re-categorising this article with patently absurd categories. If you wish to discuss the categories used, use the talk page.'' Cnbrb (talk) 21:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Friday the 13th Part 2 (2010 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Friday_the_13th_Part_2_(2010_film)&redirect=no Friday the 13th Part 2 (2010 film)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. ★Trekker (talk) 05:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)