User talk:أبو السعد 22

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question
Hello, أبو السعد 22! I'm CASSIOPEIA. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Three Impossibilities concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Three Impossibilities, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Three Impossibilities


Hello, أبو السعد 22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Three Impossibilities".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~ riley  ( talk  ) 08:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

List of Jinn in Folklore moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of Jinn in Folklore, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 15:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Jinn in Folklore (February 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Jinn in Folklore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Jinn in Folklore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_Jinn_in_Folklore Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_Jinn_in_Folklore reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 21:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Unblock
I understand everything

but I don't think this fair blocked anyone because disagreement only

they never told me anything you can search in my talk page

you should to know the difference between axiomatic information and theoretical information

axiomatic like easy information (e.g. block someone) doesn't need any source

so please give me source that I deserve to be blocked

I won't accept any source but academic source

أبو السعد 22 (talk) 17:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

I am also want any academic source that stated "there is wikipedian called أبو السعد 22 deserve to be blocked"

you need to learn the logic only theoretical informations need source not axiomatic

by your logic block someone without source is not fair

أبو السعد 22 (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Given your trolling here (asking for an academic source that says you should be blocked) and via email (bragging that you will continue to evade your block), I've revoked your access to both. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:24, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Translation
Hey, I have a request, could you translate the "Jinn"-picture on the Jinn article (Imam Ali conquers jinn) to me? I tried but I really struggle reading Arabic and Persian writings on manusrcipts. I would like to check the context of the picture and if the creatures are indeed intented to be jinn. --VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , this user has been indefinitely blocked with revocation of talk page access, so they will not be able to help you. And their editing is a problem; see this ANI discussion for why. I recommend reverting any of their edits at Jinn. Crossroads -talk- 05:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Oh thanks for the advice. Well, this surprises me, since we recently had some good exchange about Arabic words and phrases. The user has not done any edit on the Jinn-Article, however. But knew they is fluent in Arabic, therefore I asked them.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * And I was looking forward to learning the difference between a demon, an imp and a hell monster. Sure is a fine line in English, if ever a line at all. Either of you fine folks know? InedibleHulk (talk) 04:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to find out what all the different hell monsters were. But he wouldn't tell, so he had to be globally locked. Crossroads -talk- 05:32, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, like Hordak. I forget how other sorcerers managed to keep in touch with him despite all that, but it happened there and it can happen here. So soon the secrets of hell shall be ours, my shadowy new yet strangely familiar casual acquaintance! InedibleHulk (talk) 07:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:List of Jinn in Folklore concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Jinn in Folklore, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Jinn in Folklore


Hello, أبو السعد 22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Jinn in Folklore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Shayatin


A tag has been placed on Category:Shayatin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 18:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)