User talk:أحمد

Dimyat?
Hi, I noticed that you are the one who moved Dumyat to Dimyat. I changed Egypt template accordingly. But i wonder what your source was since the official site of the governorate is Domyat with an o.--Wedian 22:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, I have known it to be so for as long as I can remember; but as I looked it up again, I found it to be as I had known (with kasra on the dal) in AlWatwat and in AlMonged.
 * I'm aware that the current public pronunciation is domiat, and this is worth mentioning in the article itself. But officially it is in kasra, regardless of what the website. You're from Mansoura, how did you read it in school books? --Alif 18:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, I wasn't that good in geography at school :). I agree with you that the correct pronounciation is dimyat. However, we are not in the issue of translating the city's name. This spelling "domyat" has already been well established e.g. in mailing addresses. For example, try to search google for "dimyat", you will find that the only result referring to Dimyat city in Egypt is the wikipedia. Then, try to search google for "domyat" you will find many results referring to the city. It is more likely that anyone searching the wikipedia will try the most common spelling " domyat". I had the same problem with Mansoura: should we use the spelling "Al Mansurah" - which is used here in Wikipedia - or the more common "Mansoura"?  In my opinion, we should use the more common name and mention the correct pronounciation in the article. --Wedian 22:35, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, that's why we have redirection pages. This way those who search for the common pronunciation will still find the article, albeit through a transparent redirection to the properly named one. I agree however that this is a complex issue, and becomes even more so when it involves transliteration. --Alif 21:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi Gharbeia. What's the Arabic word? Neither Commune nor Communion quite make sense in English in this context. Incidentally, who's AbdElAziz Pasha Fahmi? It would be nice to have a stub... - Mustafaa 16:56, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I think Academy, even if it's not literal, sounds better here (like the French Académie de la langue français); on this page it's translated that way too... As for &#1601;&#1575;&#1583;&#1610;&#1580;&#1575;, it's written Fadicca in English, and it's another name for Nobiin/Mahas, as far as I can tell from Google; I just added it. - Mustafaa 19:13, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Berber / Amazigh
Hi Alef01, as per the Naming conventions, the practice is to use the most common names for subjects. Berber is far more common than Amazigh (for an easy way to see this, refer to here), so I'm going to re-reverse the redirects for both Berber and Berber languages. Hope you don't mind!

Also, if you make substantial changes like this, please consider discussing the issue on the Talk page first. In this case, the Talk:Berber page indicates that this issue has been raised earlier (though I must admit that the discussion there is rather messy). Incidentally, note that the page history becomes worthless if you just copy and past the contents from one article to the other; the best way to do such a thing without losing the page's history is by requesting assistance from an administrator. &mdash; mark &#9998; 00:41, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Forgot to add that I do know that Berber is considered a derogatory term by some peoples; the point is that this is not relevant for the naming of an encyclopedic article, as per the naming conventions. The most common way to handle issues of terminology considered by some derogatory/pejorative is to include a statement to that effect in the article. Kind regards,  &mdash; mark &#9998; 01:01, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hi! Thankd for the great articles on Egyptian saints. They are very interesting. Two things though. You wrote St Moses the Black and we already have an article Moses the Black. You should probably combine them. Also, our naming convention usually removes the word Saint and other titles, so it would be Demiana and Moses the Black. If it is a problem with disambiguation, you would write Demiana (saint). Keep up the excellent work. Danny 12:46, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Could you perhaps combine the two articles? That way we wont have two articles about the same person. Danny 12:55, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Arabic logo
There is no vector format version of the globe because it is a 3-D rendered object. There are large-resolution versions at meta:logo. The version of the Arabic Wikipedia logo currently on ar.wikipedia.org does not appear to be the same as the version I created at meta:Wikipedia in other languages, but the text of the name Wikipedia appears to be the same. The font is called "KufiStandardGK". It comes standard with Mac OS X 10.3. I don't know any other way to get it. Let me know if there is any other information I can give you. Nohat 19:18, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Star names
Hi Gharbeia,

Thanks for your contributions to the Arabic sources for the English star names. I appreciate it! I don't know of any English-language reference that gives the original Arabic, so I've been trying to create my own, and unfortunately my Arabic is pathetic. (A few sources have transliterations, but they're ambiguous and full of mistakes.)

Is there an Arabic Wikipedia article that already has all of this info?

Now if we can just get someone who knows Persian for Tarazed and Giauzar ...

Thanks again, kwami 06:23, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Hello again,


 * I've normalized our transcription systems; one concern I had is the legibility of diacritic dots to older people with poor eyesight, especially since the dots tend to drift around the page on some browsers ( instead of  for , for example).


 * More importantly, I reverted a couple of your edits. For example, as far as I know, derivations of Betelgeuse (earlier Bedelgeuse) from "house" or "armpit" of Gawza are folk etymologies based on a mistaken transliteration of &#1610; as B, and the Arabic was &#1610;&#1583; &#1575;&#1604;&#1580;&#1608;&#1586;&#1575;. Likewise the 1st, 2nd, 3rd leap of the gazelle in Ursa major. A corrupted form of leap is found as an alternate name for several of the stars involved, whereas vertebra is only found for one. (The " : :  : " pattern of the stars could be reminiscent of either.) If you have any information to the contrary, please let me know! You said that you disagreed with several of the etymologies, but I can't tell if you have access to historical documents, or to sources with a better understanding of Arab almanacs than mine, or are going on your knowledge of the language alone. Since people following standard English references such as Allan might have the same POV me, it would be great if you could document any contrary evidence in the talk page.


 * If you decide to revisit the article, I've added some more partial etymologies: transliterations (perhaps mistaken) or even just alleged translations without the Arabic.


 * Take care, kwami 09:47, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Bektashi
Thank you for adding the Arabic. You may be interested in List of Islamic terms in Arabic. freestylefrappe 15:56, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Copt
Hi! Since you were involved in editing that page, I wanted to call your attention to the article to see if you wanted to give any input on the current discussion. Thanks &mdash; [ zɪʔɾɪdəʰ ]   ·   t  19:36, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Zerida, Ezzayek!
 * Coincedently, I just took a look at Copt today and I'm very content with its content :). It's developed to being a well balanced and informative article. I need to do the same to the Arabic version. Take a look at it. لماذا لا تحررين في الإصدارة العربية، بالمناسبة؟

--Alif 20:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikimania 2007
Hi Alef01,

Wikimania 2007, which is being held in Taipei, Taiwan on August 3-5, is offering opportunities for travel scholarships to Wikimania for active users of Wikimedia projects from the continent of Africa. Although the original scholarship deadline has passed, please, if you are interested, you may still apply at Scholarships. Sincerely yours, Cary Bass15:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, Cary, for the invitation, and sorry for the belated reply. --Alif 21:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikimedia Egypt
Wikimedia Egypt

...would you like to share?--TheEgyptian 19:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

شكر متأخر على الدعوة أيها المصري. رغم أني لم أشارك في الاجتماع فقد تابع أخباره. --Alif 21:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

⳿ⲪⲂⲓⲕⲓⲡⲏ ̇ ⲋⲏ
Thank you for your contributions. If you are interested in the Coptic Wikisource (⳿ⲪⲂⲓⲕⲓⲡⲏ ̇ ⲋⲏ) Proposal, please don't hesitate to help out. Regards, ~ Troy (talk) 23:29, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa
Hello,

I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabell@undefineddoualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahf@undefinedafricacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.

If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/

Best regards, Islahaddow

(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DES. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dark Web, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deep Web. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

مرحبا أحمد
هل تعطيني وسام من فضلك محمد9088 (talk) 20:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

May 2019
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Resilient Anonymous Communication for Everyone. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at EgyptAir, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 22:24, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ontology for Media Resources


The article Ontology for Media Resources has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "no specific evidence for notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 10:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Resilient Anonymous Communication for Everyone (March 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Resilient Anonymous Communication for Everyone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Resilient Anonymous Communication for Everyone, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Resilient_Anonymous_Communication_for_Everyone Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Missvain&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Resilient_Anonymous_Communication_for_Everyone reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 23:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of commercial secure mobile companies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of commercial secure mobile companies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of commercial secure mobile companies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.    Kadzi    (talk) 16:18, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Resilient Anonymous Communication for Everyone concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Resilient Anonymous Communication for Everyone, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:23, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Resilient Anonymous Communication for Everyone


Hello, أحمد. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Resilient Anonymous Communication for Everyone".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 00:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello أحمد! Your additions to Murder of Giulio Regeni have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 13:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

wikilinks
Please do not insert overlinked wls, these would be deleted. For instance, in the Successor part there are now three overlinked wls after your revert. --Egeymi (talk) 14:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Egeymi, while there may have been links to the pages on Faisal and Saud in other parts of the article, the section "Successor" had none before I inserted those. Hence I reverted you edit which cited "overlinking". In my case as a reader, I reached page and directly jumped to Ibn_Saud, then had to scroll for long to find links to the mentioned subjects. The unit for counting overlinking be not the page, but rather the section. So let's keep one link to each relevant subject in tat section.