User talk:الشوك والملاعق

July 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to loads of pages, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''please stop spamming user talk pages with your PROD notice, it is proper unnecessary. Cheers, '' —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 18:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Really? Like what, specifically? الشوك والملاعق (talk) 19:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Like specifically, all your trolling. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room
 * Could you give one example of an unproductive edit I have made? I'm currently blocked due to mistaken identity but hope this will be reversed soon. الشوك والملاعق (talk) 19:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The instructions say to notify editors if you propose a page for deletion. I did just that. الشوك والملاعق (talk) 19:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

I am not a sockpuppet
I assume I was banned for "sockpuppetry" because I edited the Luke Heimlich article from the Oregon State University campus. He played for OSU so understandably other people with the same IP address have probably made edits to the same page. Please unban me. الشوك والملاعق (talk) 19:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * There is nothing in the technical evidence that suggests this is "mistaken identity" with cross over on more than one data point. The edit history is also not one of a new user.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:06, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I am in a large campus community of many thousands of students. There are many different possible IP addresses on and around campus. Of course there's major overlap in IPs between me and other editors of the page for our University's star pitcher. Why was there no sockpuppet investigation? Why was no evidence presented? Why was I given no chance to defend myself? What does it take to prove I'm legit? الشوك والملاعق (talk) 22:03, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by saying the edit history is not one of a new user? I improved some random articles using the "random article" feature and proposed a few of them for deletion. I don't get what's so fishy about that. الشوك والملاعق (talk) 22:05, 26 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Notification of nonexistant sockpuppet investigation

There is a very good reason I asked "Why was there no sockpuppet investigation". The message posted on my user page said "This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sock puppet of Jimbreeman3 (talk · contribs · logs), and it has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation" so I clicked on the link and there was no sockpuppet investigation about me. There was nothing newer than mid-June.--الشوك والملاعق (talk) 04:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Is there any hope for me to be unblocked? I haven't gotten the attention of an administrator for my appeal.الشوك والملاعق (talk) 07:54, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * As this is a checkuser block, it can only be reviewed by someone with the checkuser power. They are limited in number and are all volunteers, please be patient. 331dot (talk) 12:48, 10 August 2018 (UTC)