User talk:امین اکبر/Archive 2

* Archive 1 * Archive 2 Welcome to My Talk Page: User:Ameen Akbar.

DS Alert
Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 14:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 14:56, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Which "consensus" are you talking about? If you want to use a transcluded discussion from 2016 to overturn multiple conclusive discussions from 2018 at [], then you are being disruptive. Do the math and read WP:CCC. You shouldn't be citing a 2016 discussion to go against 2018 consensus. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 14:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Can you also describe why you are edit warring to restore misleading edits of USaamo on the pages that you never edited before? You must provide an explanation. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 15:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear @Aman.kumar.goel Minar e Pakistan page has long long history of editing. I have been invited by User:Bookku to comment on this. I know about this issue issue from the very first day. As far as the Pakistan page. This is my country's page, This is on my watch list with nearly 2000 pages. Thas is why I got to know of this edit warring without any effort to make a consensus. The consensus you're mentioning is not aconsensus as it ended without reaching any point.  Further, you can not enforce discussion about consensus  on other talk page here. That is why, in my openion that old consensus on same page will remain valid. In my opinion you are disruptive. Ameen Akbar (talk) 16:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Your claims sound outright false. The old discussion that happened 8 months before your edit warring to restore edits of USaamo. These two things are unrelated. You never edited Pakistan before and were using a 2016 discussion to overturn consensus reached in 2018 without bothering to do simple math. It's not like this edit ever existed for years. It was removed on Pakistan after the 2018 discussion until a disruptive sock restored it some months ago by using unreliable sources. If anything it makes you look outright disruptive which you certainly have been at least according to your recent edits. You logged in 11 days ago only to support another disruptive edit from USaamo at Iranian peoples,  and failed to explanation your view when another user asked you to. This is why your counter-accusation is too baseless and it won't fly. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 15:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I could not see or get notification about my mention on Iranic people page. After your attention when I see that page, the discussion was closed. I am not only one who vote for support. It has nothing to do with USaamo and I'm not answerable to you for my every edit and you need not to patrol anyone's especially my edits everywhere. I have replied for my edit on Pakistan where you are involved and I still think that 2018 discussion was no consensus, that was just discussion. I still think there's need to build a consensus for that removal on same talk page. You restored a sock's edit on that article which cast doubts on your removals. Ameen Akbar (talk) 13:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Faris Shafi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faris Shafi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Faris Shafi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. AmirŞah 19:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nandlal Jaswantlal
Hello, امین اکبر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nandlal Jaswantlal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constituency PP-268 (Muzaffargarh-I) has been accepted
 Constituency PP-268 (Muzaffargarh-I), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Constituency_PP-268_(Muzaffargarh-I) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  Onel 5969  TT me 23:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constituency PP-269 (Muzaffargarh-II) has been accepted
 Constituency PP-269 (Muzaffargarh-II), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Constituency_PP-269_(Muzaffargarh-II) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  Onel 5969  TT me 14:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nandlal Jaswantlal


Hello, امین اکبر. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nandlal Jaswantlal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constituency PP-270 (Muzaffargarh-III) has been accepted
 Constituency PP-270 (Muzaffargarh-III), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Constituency_PP-270_(Muzaffargarh-III) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ~Kvng (talk) 18:17, 13 November 2022 (UTC)